Taiwan has never had a president who is not from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Could next year’s presidential election put a third-party candidate in office? The contenders who have thrown their hats into the ring are Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
A monthly poll released by my-formosa.com on Monday showed support for Hou nosediving from 26 percent to 18.3 percent, the lowest among the three presidential hopefuls. It was a surprising turn, as Hou had just won re-election as mayor by a wide margin in November last year. Having bet on Hou’s popularity and “ethnic Taiwanese” image, the KMT hardly expected its handpicked candidate to fall into third place, let alone behind a small party like the TPP.
The freefall has revealed a few chinks in Hou’s armor. The mayor has been criticized as lacking preparation and the temperament to be a president. Recent events further showed his shortcomings — the biggest being his inaction to court his rival for the KMT nomination — Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘). Gou and his group of supporters, composed of KMT local factions and “deep-blue” supporters, are still smarting from what they perceive as the KMT’s duplicity in giving Gou false hope that he would be the nominee.
After staying out of the limelight for a week following Hou’s nomination, Gou appeared on Tuesday at a religious festival in Kinmen County. Gou handed Lai a folder with a proposal for a “Kinmen peace declaration.” He also teamed up with Ko in a show of unity as they participated in a sedan chair procession. Later that day, Gou and Ko were photographed seated side-by-side looking at the night sky. The rendezvous has intensified speculation that the pair might join forces for Ko’s presidential bid.
As there are no permanent enemies or friends, only permanent interests in politics, a collaboration between the two is not impossible. Ko, who has marketed himself as a “third choice” for voters sick of the DPP and KMT struggle, once said that his ideal running mate should have a business background. Gou looks like an ideal fit and the two could help each other achieve what they want.
Ko would have the financial support he needs given Gou’s deep pockets as well as support from the tycoon’s avid fans. This could give him a leg up and catapult him to second place in more polls. As Ko’s foreign policies are more in line with the KMT’s, it could unite DPP opponents to strategically vote for him instead of Hou.
Gou, by flirting with a third party, could cause panic and unease in the KMT for rejecting him. He has also worked to boost his bargaining power with a strategy that allows him to plausibly deny supporting Ko, while gaining leverage with the KMT. With his actions in Kinmen, he has presented himself as a candidate who is able to reach across the aisle to the TPP, as well as a challenger who is not afraid to question the ideology of Lai, his main opponent.
Gou’s increasing popularity and publicity stand in sharp contrast to Hou’s absence and passivity. His growing presence would put pressure on Hou and the KMT itself, which might compel Hou to bow out of the race or spur party members to demand that he be replaced by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) or Gou.
It remains to be seen if Gou would really turn his back on the KMT and collaborate with Ko. After all, both Ko and Gou are strong personalities who are not keen on playing second fiddle. As the KMT is unlikely to repeat its disastrous 2016 presidential playbook when it replaced former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) with Chu as the candidate, it might find it has another opponent to deal with if Hou continues to lose popularity. Perhaps Taiwan could really see a third-party candidate in office next year.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS