On Sunday, Recep Tayyip Erdogan was declared the winner of Turkey’s presidential runoff elections. According to numbers reported by the state-owned Anadolu news agency, more than 27 million people cast their ballots in favor of Erdogan, who has been at the country’s helm for more than two decades. He entered the second round in the lead in the polls and was expected by most to emerge victorious.
Although Erdogan captured slightly more than half of the vote, more than 25 million people also mobilized to vote against him.
The elections were being held under deeply unfair conditions, with an opposition set up to fail. Istanbul’s mayor, Ekrem Imamoglu, was recently sentenced to more than two years in prison and banned from holding public office for insulting members of the supreme election council. This left the opposition unable to nominate its maybe most promising candidate.
This was all amid biased media coverage, relentless smear campaigns against the eventual opposition candidate, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, threats, manipulation and a crackdown on civil society, such as the arrest of 126 Kurdish lawyers, rights advocates and politicians at the end of April in Diyarbakir.
Everything was at stake in a country where the judiciary now does little more than rubber-stamp policy dictated by the president.
It would be an understatement to say that for rights defenders, five more years under Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AK) is a daunting prospect. Women’s and LGBTQ+ rights groups especially will find themselves in the immediate line of fire. During his first victory speech in Istanbul last night, Erdoan targeted LGBTQ+ groups again.
“Could those LGBT elements ever find their way into the AK party?” he asked to a resounding “no” from the crowd. “Family is holy to us.”
Ahead of the runoff elections, women’s rights group Left Feminist Movement warned that the choice between Erdogan and Kilicdaroglu was one between “darkness” and “light.”
A statement signed by several dozen well-known female musicians, actors, writers and rights defenders said: “We either succeed in tearing apart the darkness and glimpse the light of dawn, or we will suffocate.”
Many have argued that Turkey has never had a more ultra-conservative and misogynistic parliament than it does now. Two radical Islamist fringe parties have joined the national assembly on Erdogan’s side.
The Justice and Development Party has not only brought the New Welfare Party into its alliance, but also nominated four senior members of the Kurdish Free Cause Party under its parliamentary candidate list. All four were elected to parliament on May 14.
The Free Cause party is closely affiliated with Kurdish Hezbollah, a Sunni militant group that originated in the Turkish southeast and gained notoriety in the 1990s when its members tortured and killed hundreds of Kurdistan Workers’ Party members and supporters, as well as others who opposed its ideology, although it has since officially renounced violence.
Free Cause calls for gender segregation in schools and has argued that state services for women, such as healthcare or education, should only be rendered by female employees.
Meanwhile, in the New Welfare party’s manifesto, it demands that “morals, chastity, mercy, devotion and productivity” should be strengthened among women through female “role models.”
Both parties have aggressively lobbied against LGBTQ+ rights, targeting them as “perversion,” as well as for the criminalization of adultery. They have also vowed to scrap law 6284, introduced by the AK government in 2012, which aims to prevent violence against women.
Women’s rights advocates have accused them of aiming for “Taliban-style” rule.
Despite almost unfettered presidential powers, Erdogan might need the support of these parties to push through legislative changes in parliament. Their presence further normalizes discriminatory attitudes, already rampant among the governing bloc, toward women and LGBTQ+ people inside and outside state politics.
In 2021, Erdoan unilaterally withdrew Turkey from the Istanbul convention, an international treaty to fight gender-based discrimination and violence. Women’s rights groups reported that police officers had refused to assist victims of domestic violence, citing the withdrawal from the convention.
Last year, bogus charges of “acting against morality” were brought against We Will Stop Femicide, a feminist platform that fights gender-based violence and keeps a monthly count of murdered women. If convicted, the group would be shut down.
On Sunday, rights activists said that the election results should not deter people from fighting.
“Our hopes should not be broken, but we need to be aware of the consequences,” We Will Stop Femicide general secretary Fidan Ataselim wrote on Twitter. “We have no other choice than to keep organizing, to give voice to reason and to stick together.”
At the same time, political leaders around the world rushed to congratulate Erdoan on his election win. EU politicians are perhaps a little too relieved that the Turkish president, who has been a willing partner in their project to keep refugees out of EU states, will remain in power.
For them, Kati Piri, a Dutch member of parliament and former Turkey EU rapporteur, had one question: “What’s your message to the 25 million people who voted for restoration of democracy and rule of law?”
Constanze Letsch is a former Turkey correspondent for the Guardian and completed a doctorate on urban renewal in Istanbul.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS