Two freshmen candidates running on the same ticket in a National Taiwan University (NTU) student election stoked controversy by using discriminatory language in their campaign proposals. Even though the two economics students quickly issued a public apology and suspended their campaigns, it is most certain they are going to pay a price for their misbehavior.
The incident has brought to the forefront college students’ indifference toward class, race and gender. It also highlights the crucial problem with Taiwan’s modern democratic elections in that, more often than not, candidates with well-rounded proposals that seek to serve the public interest are drowned out by the cacophony of others.
There were other sets of candidates running in the student council election, with some proposing to “publish the balance sheet at regular intervals,” “increase the number of industrial workshops” “organize more social events to unite students” or “get students to volunteer for a tutoring group.”
From normal student council elections to representative politics in a democratic society, these proposals are the type of policies that committed candidates running for a public position should offer the electorate.
However, what made into the public spotlight were proposals such as calls for “girls with boobs smaller than an A cup” to take two national defense credits and boys with “dicks shorter than 10cm” to take home economics class. Overblown, unscrupulous and self-serving proposals such as these have caught the attention of the public.
People are preoccupied with condemning bigoted proposals instead of engaging in productive discussions concerning public interest. Rational, civic debates are being shouted down by voices lamenting the decline of college students.
However, looking back at election campaigns from the past few years, populist politicians have tapped into people’s emotions by using trash talk, fancy promises and boastful remarks to garner publicity.
People, regardless of their political affiliation, are familiar with remarks such as “building the Love Ferris wheel,” “gynecologists only got one hole to deal with” and “doing squats in exchange for free rides on the bus.”
In view of these political shenanigans, it is highly probable that the college students were exposed to such inane behavior while they were adolescents and thought they could model their campaigns after these politicians. Influenced by former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman (TPP) Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) comments, which intentionally sought to shock, they were misguided into thinking that they could become Internet celebrities or influencers by imitating their flamboyant, incendiary style.
Behind the political inanity, the public, forgetting that there are others who take the position seriously, were usually concerned with making fun of, rebuking or defending the remarks instead of focusing on the main purpose of the election: to elect a representative or leader that meets the public’s standards and expectations.
In this way, candidates that are willing to devote themselves to public service were brushed aside and were compelled to entertain the thought of sinking as low as their rivals.
Perhaps NTU’s council election is a reminder that in next year’s presidential election, media in control of discourse should not fall into the pitfall of political trash talk.
Lin Ching-tang is a former member of the Campaign for Media Reform and a former convener of Solidarity of Communication Students. He is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s policy department.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS