A report published in the Journal of Contemporary China on May 14 indicated that about half of Chinese would be in favor of using military force to achieve unification with Taiwan.
Rand Corporation Hu Taiwan Policy Initiative director Raymond Kuo (郭泓均) said the actual number supporting the use of force might be as low as 25 percent due to factors including self-censorship and the possibility of US involvement in a hypothetical conflict. Chinese are savvy enough to realize that their way of life could be destroyed if a war broke out.
Since Russia invaded Ukraine, Russians have found themselves unable to travel to some places, have had to pay more for things, and in some cases have been unable to buy things due to international sanctions and companies exiting the Russian market.
It is also highly unlikely that China could successfully mount an invasion of Taiwan, due to geographical factors, Taiwanese defenses and the likelihood of other countries providing Taiwan with military assistance. Also, if China were to attempt to blockade Taiwan, it would likely face swift and crippling economic sanctions from the US and Europe, and would even be cutting itself off from the computer chips, machinery and other economically important items it buys from Taiwan — and that is assuming the US would not break the blockade, which US Pacific Fleet Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said in October last year that it could easily do.
All of this means that Chinese military aggression against Taiwan is exceedingly likely to result in failure and be highly detrimental to China. The Chinese public, for all its nationalistic posturing, is aware of this.
This is corroborated in a report by Nikkei senior staff writer Katsuji Nakazawa published on May 11. Nakazawa wrote that China’s military planners are aware that its forces would be spread thin fighting on four fronts against US allies in the event of a war.
Moreover, the Chinese public has been allowed to discuss the issue online.
“Some ordinary Chinese have come to sincerely believe that war will break out over Taiwan in the near future, pitting Chinese forces against formidable US troops,” he wrote. “Parents in China do not want to send their children to battle. This feeling has spread on Chinese social media, striking a chord among quite a few netizens.”
Although China is an oppressive, authoritarian state where the public has no avenue for meaningful participation in politics, Beijing has shown that it takes public opinion into account when it has its back against the wall. This was demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic when successive lockdowns left people in major cities unable to purchase food and basic necessities. Public protests ensued, and although many people were arrested, Beijing ended lockdowns and eased other restrictions.
With its “wolf warrior” diplomacy, Beijing is walking a thin line between maintaining legitimacy and causing actions that negatively affect China’s economy.
“If the impression were to take hold that a war over Taiwan is imminent, it would also put the brakes on foreign companies expanding into China, not to mention trigger an outflow of Chinese assets abroad,” Nakazawa wrote.
China cannot possibly win a war against Taiwan, but it has increased its threatening rhetoric, and the frequency of its drills and incursions in the Taiwan Strait. That is because Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) needs to justify his tightening grip on power.
Taiwan and nations friendly to it must continue to express to China that the consequences of acts of aggression against Taiwan would be more than Beijing could afford. Those messages seem to be getting through to the Chinese public.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS