Students have voiced their indignation and many members of the public are angry after a series of incidents on the National Taiwan University campus involving discriminatory language about indigenous people.
Is it a failure of education? Why have such slurs against indigenous people occured at Taiwan’s top university? As an indigenous person, I am angry and sad.
When I was growing up, I was often looked at askance for being an indigenous person. Some people thought that the system of reserving places for indigenous students at high schools and colleges, and giving them bonus points for enrollment was welfare provided because indigenous people are “savages” living in “backward” conditions.
Some people even openly mocked indigenous languages. When I was at elementary school and high school, we were not allowed to speak our own languages.
These experiences have left a lasting impression.
During the process of colonization and state hegemony, indigenous people’s land, languages and knowledge were stripped away and suppressed, so that many have gradually lost the knowledge about their own communities, as well as their identity and confidence.
Many people still harbor prejudice and misunderstand the government policies designed to protect indigenous people’s rights, giving rise to discrimination and labeling.
Government departments have been improving and implementing policies concerning indigenous people’s rights and status, such as land rights, linguistic and cultural development, and social care.
The government’s promotion of transitional justice for indigenous people has also made conditions fairer for the ethnic groups so badly oppressed in the past.
However, the government should address the repeated incidents of discrimination. It should launch social initiatives and policies, and promote legislation such as an anti-discrimination act and an ethnic communities equality act.
More curriculum hours should be devoted to lessons related to diversity and ethnic history, to improve students’ understanding of indigenous people.
Only then will it be possible to reduce misunderstanding and prejudice, and create a social environment of kindness, friendship and mutual respect.
Ma Jhih-jheng is a social work supervisor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS