The 76th World Health Assembly (WHA) opened on Sunday in Geneva, Switzerland, once again without Taiwan. The snub was formalized yesterday with a vote preceded by pleas from China and Pakistan to bar Taiwan from the proceedings.
It has become a well-worn refrain every year since Taiwan’s observer status was stripped in 2017 following the election of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文): Taiwan protests the lack of an invitation, allies and some global partners chastise Beijing for its gratuitous disregard for global health and the meetings continue without Taiwan. Even Taiwanese reporters are blocked from events, as the Central News Agency was yesterday from the UN office in Geneva, despite having received press credentials.
Like clockwork, this tableau provides an annual stage upon which Taiwan and China act out their relationship for the world to see, with Beijing playing the oversized bully as Taipei shouts for justice from inside the locker it was stuffed into. Yet as it hears the same pleas year after year, the world is taking greater notice.
This time, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ tally, more than 6,000 people and groups around the world have called for Taiwan’s inclusion. Hailing from five continents and more than 70 countries, legislatures, think tanks, health professionals, academics and civil groups have given speeches, passed resolutions, made inquiries, published videos, held marches, posted on social media and more, creating an exigent wave of sound to buttress Taiwan’s lonesome voice. The ministry has also cheered higher-level support than in previous years, with senior ministers and multilateral summits issuing their own statements.
The WHA stage is as large as it is thanks to the modesty of Taiwan’s request. No matter what you think of Indo-Pacific politics, even the most pragmatic actor would find it difficult to argue against allowing access as a mere observer to an organization whose mission is to protect global health through open channels of communication. Exclusion from other global bodies such as the UN and International Civil Aviation Organization might be just as unjustified, but the salience of the WHO is more palpable, especially as the world recovers from a tragic pandemic overcome only through global cooperation. For those with only a passing understanding of the politics and history miring the two sides, the WHA makes it clear just how far China will go to silence Taiwan, as well as just how much Taiwan has to offer the world.
Taiwan has also grasped the opportunity to pique a sympathetic ear while it is listening. It has continued its social media campaign with the hashtags #TaiwanCanHelp, #LetTaiwanHelp, #LetTaiwanIn and #WHONeedsTaiwan, which have been adopted by thousands. Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) is in Geneva to get Taiwan’s message across, setting the record straight on Sunday by saying that the WHO director-general can unilaterally extend Taiwan an invitation without a members’ vote, despite what Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has claimed. The Taiwan United Nations Alliance and healthcare representatives are also in the Swiss city to hold exhibitions, give talks and attend events, ensuring that Taiwan’s presence is felt on the outskirts of the meetings.
While the world is watching, Taiwan is doing all it can to put its best foot forward and show that it has the determination, wherewithal and expertise to earn its seat at the table — as it does every year. Although it is disappointing that yet another WHA will pass without an invitation, supporters should take heart that people are listening, and that they are sympathetic. There are few better opportunities to get Taiwan’s message across than right now, and it is doing just that.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS