On Wednesday last week, a Taichung MRT train crashed into a crane boom that fell onto the tracks, leaving one person dead and 10 injured. Many initially thought it was negligence on the part of the construction company that led to the fatal accident, leading Taichung Mass Rapid Transit Corp to conduct a series of inspections of construction sites along its MRT tracks.
Further investigation has revealed that the operation control center received 16 automatic warning signals about power system abnormalities in the six seconds after the boom fell onto the tracks, but the employees did not identify the problem in time.
The incident shows that the warning system has major flaws.
Taichung Mass Rapid Transit Corp needs to address the issue of signal ambiguity. As there have previously been a fair share of “sudden” power outages or shortages, MRT employees have developed the knee-jerk reaction of attributing the cause to power shortage and overlooking other possibilities. In this case, as the warning signal only said “power anomaly” instead of a more specific description, such as “unknown object on the track,” employees were misled into treating it as another power outage.
The warning system needs to be improved to avoid employees making the wrong decision or delaying notification.
Furthermore, even though various reasons and factors could all contribute to a power anomaly, the MRT employees, in this case, misjudged the situation due to their experiences dealing with power shortages. As most of the previous incidents were power-related and only needed minor troubleshooting, they were lulled into a false sense of security, resulting in a major error of judgement. If the employees had been given more specific or precise warning signals in the first place, they might not have made such a mistake.
Neither did the warning system provide specific anomaly information. While it is equipped with the preliminary function of detecting anomalies on the tracks, it can only show “power anomaly” for all anomalies. Under such circumstances, it would be challenging for employees to make the right judgement given such little information.
One possible improvement would be to link the warning system to the braking system. If the technical level-up cannot be achieved within a short period, the company may have to resort to other supplementary measures so that on-site workers can receive accurate information in time for informed decisionmaking.
There were a series of causes that culminated in the accident, including the construction company’s negligence governing on-site security, a flawed warning system, a faulty power supply system and a lack of on-the-job and scenario-based training. As a result, it is unfair for on-site employees to shoulder all the blame.
In the wake of the incident, the Taichung MRT has proposed three changes to its protocols, together with the introduction of two potential hardware updates.
The first is to enhance and standardize its emergency alert hand signals. The second is to encourage passengers who witness an accident to prevent the doors from closing, which would stop the train from leaving the station. The third would seek to ensure that Taichung MRT employees on trains can readily access their tool bags so it would be easier to stop the train.
As the investigation into the causes of the accident proceeds, we should also remember to take into account other causes that contributed to the accident in the hopes of preventing future tragedies.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of