The Legislative Yuan is conducting a line-by-line review of the proposed indigenous peoples health act.
As a social worker carrying out services in indigenous communities, I can tell you that there is an overall shortage of healthcare resources in those communities. This is because the existing healthcare and medical policy is lacking an understanding of indigenous peoples’ everyday environment, as well as failing to address the different needs of indigenous people.
Ministry of the Interior data show that the average life expectancy of indigenous people in 2021 was 6.94 years shorter than the rest of the population of Taiwan. The gap is due to various factors.
For one, indigenous people have experienced misunderstandings or even discrimination from some healthcare workers due to their lifestyle and habits. More often than not, there are also conflicts in patient-physician relationships because of the language barrier, and that is where social workers need to intervene to act as a cultural interpreter and help integrate resources.
In the face of this predicament, the passing of the indigenous peoples health act should be able to assist the government in addressing the uneven distribution of healthcare resources via research on indigenous culture, and the integration of resources and social campaigns.
Only in this way can the gap between average life expectancy of indigenous people and the general population be shortened.
From the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to the White Paper on Health and Welfare Policy and the Indigenous Peoples Chapter (衛生福利政策白皮書暨原住民族專章) published by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, it is high time that the government takes a step further in addressing ethnic health inequalities.
I hope legislators and the public can come together as one to support and accelerate the passing of the act, so that Taiwan can live up to its reputation of being a truly diverse and inclusive society.
Ma Chih-cheng,
Hualien County
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS