According to newspaper reports, oral tests are to be gradually added to national examinations starting next year.
Additionally, for jobs that require high stress resistance and emotional stability or involve firearms, science-based psychological tests are to be used to help with talent selection.
Although the new direction is correct, there must also be adequate preparation.
The psychological requirements for different civil servant positions vary greatly. For example, the psychological qualities needed for a general administrative post are different from those for a National Security Bureau job. Despite some special examinations including oral tests, it seems difficult to pick the right people based on a brief exam.
Also, a particular psychological quality might be an advantage for one type of work, but a disadvantage for another.
The Examination Yuan must create a database of psychological traits required by different types of jobs and establish a baseline for each position and level. By comparing applicants’ psychological test results against such a baseline, the government would be able to understand whether they are suitable for the jobs they are applying for.
Next, the government should reform its training and promotion systems to encourage employees to enhance their mental fortitude. The psychological qualities required to serve as a junior, intermediate or senior-level civil servant are not the same.
However, the curriculum does not provide psychological training for next-level posts.
Psychological tests should also be integrated with the assessment of the related training and promotion systems.
Although an intermediate-level civil servant might have completed the training necessary for a promotion to senior level, if their mental state does not fully meet the baseline of a good senior employee, the training system should offer courses on improving their mental fortitude. That person should not be promoted until they pass all the courses.
The high-tech industry has long incorporated psychological tests in talent recruitment, to reduce training costs while boosting industrial efficiency.
Today, the functions required by modern civil servants are different from those required by officials who were selected through the imperial examination system of the past. Therefore, national examinations should be adjusted in a timely manner.
Liu Chao-lung is an associate professor in National Changhua University of Education’s Department of Public Affairs and Civic Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS