Some opposition lawmakers have proposed tasking the central bank with creating a sovereign wealth fund financed by the nation’s foreign exchange reserves to boost investment returns. They have clearly conflated the monetary regulator’s job with that of a fund manager.
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) proposed allocating 10 percent of the nation’s foreign reserves — US$560.2 billion as of last month — to a sovereign wealth fund, following in the footsteps of Norway, Singapore, China and South Korea.
Taiwan has the world’s fourth-largest foreign exchange reserves, which last month rose for a record sixth consecutive month.
Wu said that in light of such massive reserves, the 2.6 percent annual return on the central bank’s management of foreign exchange reserves was too low, compared with the average 7 percent that Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, GIC Pte, has yielded since its inception in 1981.
A similar sovereign wealth fund run by the central bank could seek the highest financial returns by diversifying its investment targets, Wu said, adding that investing in foreign companies with strategic technologies could enhance Taiwan’s global clout.
She said the creation of such a fund is imperative, as about 80 percent of G20 countries have set up sovereign wealth funds, adding that 64 other lawmakers have endorsed her proposal.
However, Wu’s plan does not go beyond wishful thinking, as there is no guarantee that an investment will be profitable. Furthermore, higher returns require higher risks, while investing in companies with strategic technologies does not mean owning the technologies, nor playing a deciding role in steering the companies’ operations.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, the biggest of its kind, lost US$167 billion last year, with an annual return rate of minus-13.9 percent.
The central bank’s main tasks are to keep inflation within its target range, and maintain stability in the financial markets and the local currency, as Taiwan is prone to volatility in external markets. Turning a profit has never been the bank’s first priority.
More importantly, Taiwan must protect itself from potential financial meltdowns, as it is not a member of the IMF and external aid might not always be on hand.
Large foreign exchange reserves are a protection tool and can provide emergency capital for local lenders during tough times. Taiwan’s deep foreign exchange reserves helped it weather global financial crises in 1997 and 2008.
A large portion of Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves is constituted by local stocks and bonds held by foreign investors, with a market value of US$538.9 billion. Any significant outflows could cause a drastic reduction in foreign exchange reserves.
A sovereign wealth fund invests in real and financial assets. Taiwan already has four such wealth funds, including the Labor Pension Fund. Before the government can consider setting up a new sovereign wealth fund, there are several questions that need to be answered: What is the purpose of setting up a new fund? How will the fund be financed? Is it appropriate to finance the fund from the nation’s foreign exchange reserves? Does the fund need to be operated by the central bank?
The lawmakers who proposed setting up such a fund should have thought twice about their plan.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS