Some opposition lawmakers have proposed tasking the central bank with creating a sovereign wealth fund financed by the nation’s foreign exchange reserves to boost investment returns. They have clearly conflated the monetary regulator’s job with that of a fund manager.
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) proposed allocating 10 percent of the nation’s foreign reserves — US$560.2 billion as of last month — to a sovereign wealth fund, following in the footsteps of Norway, Singapore, China and South Korea.
Taiwan has the world’s fourth-largest foreign exchange reserves, which last month rose for a record sixth consecutive month.
Wu said that in light of such massive reserves, the 2.6 percent annual return on the central bank’s management of foreign exchange reserves was too low, compared with the average 7 percent that Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, GIC Pte, has yielded since its inception in 1981.
A similar sovereign wealth fund run by the central bank could seek the highest financial returns by diversifying its investment targets, Wu said, adding that investing in foreign companies with strategic technologies could enhance Taiwan’s global clout.
She said the creation of such a fund is imperative, as about 80 percent of G20 countries have set up sovereign wealth funds, adding that 64 other lawmakers have endorsed her proposal.
However, Wu’s plan does not go beyond wishful thinking, as there is no guarantee that an investment will be profitable. Furthermore, higher returns require higher risks, while investing in companies with strategic technologies does not mean owning the technologies, nor playing a deciding role in steering the companies’ operations.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, the biggest of its kind, lost US$167 billion last year, with an annual return rate of minus-13.9 percent.
The central bank’s main tasks are to keep inflation within its target range, and maintain stability in the financial markets and the local currency, as Taiwan is prone to volatility in external markets. Turning a profit has never been the bank’s first priority.
More importantly, Taiwan must protect itself from potential financial meltdowns, as it is not a member of the IMF and external aid might not always be on hand.
Large foreign exchange reserves are a protection tool and can provide emergency capital for local lenders during tough times. Taiwan’s deep foreign exchange reserves helped it weather global financial crises in 1997 and 2008.
A large portion of Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves is constituted by local stocks and bonds held by foreign investors, with a market value of US$538.9 billion. Any significant outflows could cause a drastic reduction in foreign exchange reserves.
A sovereign wealth fund invests in real and financial assets. Taiwan already has four such wealth funds, including the Labor Pension Fund. Before the government can consider setting up a new sovereign wealth fund, there are several questions that need to be answered: What is the purpose of setting up a new fund? How will the fund be financed? Is it appropriate to finance the fund from the nation’s foreign exchange reserves? Does the fund need to be operated by the central bank?
The lawmakers who proposed setting up such a fund should have thought twice about their plan.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to