Some opposition lawmakers have proposed tasking the central bank with creating a sovereign wealth fund financed by the nation’s foreign exchange reserves to boost investment returns. They have clearly conflated the monetary regulator’s job with that of a fund manager.
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) proposed allocating 10 percent of the nation’s foreign reserves — US$560.2 billion as of last month — to a sovereign wealth fund, following in the footsteps of Norway, Singapore, China and South Korea.
Taiwan has the world’s fourth-largest foreign exchange reserves, which last month rose for a record sixth consecutive month.
Wu said that in light of such massive reserves, the 2.6 percent annual return on the central bank’s management of foreign exchange reserves was too low, compared with the average 7 percent that Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, GIC Pte, has yielded since its inception in 1981.
A similar sovereign wealth fund run by the central bank could seek the highest financial returns by diversifying its investment targets, Wu said, adding that investing in foreign companies with strategic technologies could enhance Taiwan’s global clout.
She said the creation of such a fund is imperative, as about 80 percent of G20 countries have set up sovereign wealth funds, adding that 64 other lawmakers have endorsed her proposal.
However, Wu’s plan does not go beyond wishful thinking, as there is no guarantee that an investment will be profitable. Furthermore, higher returns require higher risks, while investing in companies with strategic technologies does not mean owning the technologies, nor playing a deciding role in steering the companies’ operations.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, the biggest of its kind, lost US$167 billion last year, with an annual return rate of minus-13.9 percent.
The central bank’s main tasks are to keep inflation within its target range, and maintain stability in the financial markets and the local currency, as Taiwan is prone to volatility in external markets. Turning a profit has never been the bank’s first priority.
More importantly, Taiwan must protect itself from potential financial meltdowns, as it is not a member of the IMF and external aid might not always be on hand.
Large foreign exchange reserves are a protection tool and can provide emergency capital for local lenders during tough times. Taiwan’s deep foreign exchange reserves helped it weather global financial crises in 1997 and 2008.
A large portion of Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves is constituted by local stocks and bonds held by foreign investors, with a market value of US$538.9 billion. Any significant outflows could cause a drastic reduction in foreign exchange reserves.
A sovereign wealth fund invests in real and financial assets. Taiwan already has four such wealth funds, including the Labor Pension Fund. Before the government can consider setting up a new sovereign wealth fund, there are several questions that need to be answered: What is the purpose of setting up a new fund? How will the fund be financed? Is it appropriate to finance the fund from the nation’s foreign exchange reserves? Does the fund need to be operated by the central bank?
The lawmakers who proposed setting up such a fund should have thought twice about their plan.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS