Transport passes
The Executive Yuan recently approved the central government’s promotion plan for the use of public transport, which would subsidize a NT$1,200 monthly public transport pass program for people who commute by bus, MRT, train or public bikes in Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Taoyuan in northern Taiwan.
In central and southern Taiwan, there would be two types of commuter passes: the “intercity pass” and “intracity pass.” Some other cities and counties could also develop passes. The Cabinet’s plan would take effect in July.
The NT$1,200 monthly pass, which would offer unlimited rides on public transport in northern Taiwan, is an upgrade of the current NT$1,280 pass for Taipei and New Taipei City, which is only applicable to buses and MRT trains. By expanding the scope to Keelung and Taoyuan, the policy would benefit commuters.
However, local governments should urge the central government to subsidize local bus operators to open more routes.
It should increase services and make transfers more convenient. Without sufficient routes and convenient transfers, the cheap passes might not convince commuters to drop the habit of driving or riding a scooter to work.
The notorious 9026 bus service connecting downtown Keelung with Taipei’s Nangang Bus Station only runs once an hour, so why would a monthly commuter pass be helpful?
If the local governments’ commuter passes are successful, they could be integrated to apply to all regions. For instance, if the pass for northern Taiwan can also be used in central, southern and eastern Taiwan during holidays, the passes are likely to boost local tourism.
Wang Chung-hsuan
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its