Transport passes
The Executive Yuan recently approved the central government’s promotion plan for the use of public transport, which would subsidize a NT$1,200 monthly public transport pass program for people who commute by bus, MRT, train or public bikes in Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Taoyuan in northern Taiwan.
In central and southern Taiwan, there would be two types of commuter passes: the “intercity pass” and “intracity pass.” Some other cities and counties could also develop passes. The Cabinet’s plan would take effect in July.
The NT$1,200 monthly pass, which would offer unlimited rides on public transport in northern Taiwan, is an upgrade of the current NT$1,280 pass for Taipei and New Taipei City, which is only applicable to buses and MRT trains. By expanding the scope to Keelung and Taoyuan, the policy would benefit commuters.
However, local governments should urge the central government to subsidize local bus operators to open more routes.
It should increase services and make transfers more convenient. Without sufficient routes and convenient transfers, the cheap passes might not convince commuters to drop the habit of driving or riding a scooter to work.
The notorious 9026 bus service connecting downtown Keelung with Taipei’s Nangang Bus Station only runs once an hour, so why would a monthly commuter pass be helpful?
If the local governments’ commuter passes are successful, they could be integrated to apply to all regions. For instance, if the pass for northern Taiwan can also be used in central, southern and eastern Taiwan during holidays, the passes are likely to boost local tourism.
Wang Chung-hsuan
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS