Transport passes
The Executive Yuan recently approved the central government’s promotion plan for the use of public transport, which would subsidize a NT$1,200 monthly public transport pass program for people who commute by bus, MRT, train or public bikes in Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Taoyuan in northern Taiwan.
In central and southern Taiwan, there would be two types of commuter passes: the “intercity pass” and “intracity pass.” Some other cities and counties could also develop passes. The Cabinet’s plan would take effect in July.
The NT$1,200 monthly pass, which would offer unlimited rides on public transport in northern Taiwan, is an upgrade of the current NT$1,280 pass for Taipei and New Taipei City, which is only applicable to buses and MRT trains. By expanding the scope to Keelung and Taoyuan, the policy would benefit commuters.
However, local governments should urge the central government to subsidize local bus operators to open more routes.
It should increase services and make transfers more convenient. Without sufficient routes and convenient transfers, the cheap passes might not convince commuters to drop the habit of driving or riding a scooter to work.
The notorious 9026 bus service connecting downtown Keelung with Taipei’s Nangang Bus Station only runs once an hour, so why would a monthly commuter pass be helpful?
If the local governments’ commuter passes are successful, they could be integrated to apply to all regions. For instance, if the pass for northern Taiwan can also be used in central, southern and eastern Taiwan during holidays, the passes are likely to boost local tourism.
Wang Chung-hsuan
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers