On Monday last week, a three-year-old girl died and her mother was injured after a vehicle making a left turn collided with them as they crossed an intersection in Tainan.
The incident has caused an uproar, as it is not the only pedestrian traffic incident involving women and children recently.
Since a CNN article referred to Taiwan as a “living hell” for pedestrians, the public has demanded that the government address the issue.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications responded by suggesting that all local governments should implement scramble crossings at all intersections.
The pros and cons of this measure have been debated across the country. A scramble crossing allows people to cross in any direction with all traffic signals for vehicles red, creating pedestrian-only crossing times, which would prevent collisions.
Many countries have implemented the measure. In Taiwan, such traffic signals operate on roads close to the Taipei City Government. From my experience, they are effective and worth promoting. With scramble crossings, pedestrians can cross the road diagonally, and their safety would be protected.
However, for drivers, scramble crossings require more time waiting for a green light, which could cause discontent. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications and local governments must plan safety measures with care, especially on narrower roads and in areas with more traffic.
Not every intersection is suitable for a scramble crossing. Officials should first evaluate which locations are suitable, then consider the times pedestrian-only crossings should be designated. The length of the crossing time should also be deliberated.
Further arrangements and supporting measures should be planned. With scramble crossings, traffic congestion is likely to be more frequent, and worsen during rush hour.
To avoid these problems, the government should modify rules about the lanes for turning vehicles. Otherwise, queues in those lanes would make congestion worse, and the public would find fault with local officials and enforcement units.
The fundamental problem is that most drivers in Taiwan fail to show respect to pedestrians. It is not an exaggeration to say that drivers and scooter riders have made the country a “living hell” for pedestrians.
Agencies and authorities must publicize traffic rules and regulations, and make it clear that anyone who breaks the law would be punished harshly. Hopefully this would prevent traffic collisions and make pedestrians safer.
The situation has recently improved. When I cross an intersection, I can see that drivers and scooter riders are more patient.
They stop their vehicles and allow me to walk across first. In return, I give them a thumbs up to show my gratitude. I want drivers to know that their patience allows me to cross the road in peace.
Other than implementing scramble crossings nationwide, the government should keep educating the public on the importance of respecting pedestrians, and it should enforce harsher punishments for those who break the law. Hopefully, Taiwan will no longer be a living hell for pedestrians.
Tsai Jr-keng is a retired elementary-school teacher living in Taipei.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS