An opinion piece published a few days ago cited parts of a 2016 paper published by researchers from the University of Maryland and other institutions in the US, which said that solar power plants could cause a “photovoltaic heat island” effect.
This issue was picked up by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Tainan city councilors, who used it as a theme for a question-and-answer session.
The councilors stretched the research findings out of proportion by saying the heat island effect created by solar panels is the cause of Tainan’s long-term drought, lack of rainfall and record temperatures.
The KMT councilors who spoke on this issue included Wang Jia-jen (王家貞), Tsai Yu-hui (蔡育輝), Tsai Chung-hao (蔡宗豪), Lin Yen-chu (林燕祝) and Lee Chung-tsen (李中岑).
Without having carefully studied the research methodology, scale and time span of the research paper, they applied its findings to Tainan and denigrated solar energy as a cause of the drought.
The way they distorted the development of solar energy is staggering.
Academics from institutions including National Taiwan University, National Cheng Kung University and Academia Sinica reviewed the research paper and agreed to be interviewed by the Science Media Center Taiwan.
They said that the research was done in an arid desert with conditions quite different from Taiwan’s climate. They said that with such big environmental differences, the research results measured in one place cannot be directly applied to the other.
Meteorologist Peng Chi-ming (彭啟明) said that the drought in southern Taiwan is mainly because several typhoons over the past few years slipped past Taiwan, resulting in less rainfall than the historic average.
The academic community does not agree that the US research findings can be arbitrarily applied to Taiwan.
These councilors and the media that followed their lead by heavily covering the story have taken overseas research out of context, either out of ignorance or by deliberately omitting the differences in geography, climate, hydrology, environment and other conditions.
It is hard to avoid wondering what political intentions they might have for doing so.
The councilors’ right and power to supervise government officials should be respected, but they should desist from cherry-picking and citing things out of context with no understanding of the science.
If the councilors want to resolve the drought crisis, they should use practical action to help farmers coordinate the available water resources, and support the development of water reclamation and desalination plants, rather than spouting useless rhetoric in the council chamber.
Hsu Jui-yuan is a Tainan resident with a master’s degree in civil engineering.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS