An opinion piece published a few days ago cited parts of a 2016 paper published by researchers from the University of Maryland and other institutions in the US, which said that solar power plants could cause a “photovoltaic heat island” effect.
This issue was picked up by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Tainan city councilors, who used it as a theme for a question-and-answer session.
The councilors stretched the research findings out of proportion by saying the heat island effect created by solar panels is the cause of Tainan’s long-term drought, lack of rainfall and record temperatures.
The KMT councilors who spoke on this issue included Wang Jia-jen (王家貞), Tsai Yu-hui (蔡育輝), Tsai Chung-hao (蔡宗豪), Lin Yen-chu (林燕祝) and Lee Chung-tsen (李中岑).
Without having carefully studied the research methodology, scale and time span of the research paper, they applied its findings to Tainan and denigrated solar energy as a cause of the drought.
The way they distorted the development of solar energy is staggering.
Academics from institutions including National Taiwan University, National Cheng Kung University and Academia Sinica reviewed the research paper and agreed to be interviewed by the Science Media Center Taiwan.
They said that the research was done in an arid desert with conditions quite different from Taiwan’s climate. They said that with such big environmental differences, the research results measured in one place cannot be directly applied to the other.
Meteorologist Peng Chi-ming (彭啟明) said that the drought in southern Taiwan is mainly because several typhoons over the past few years slipped past Taiwan, resulting in less rainfall than the historic average.
The academic community does not agree that the US research findings can be arbitrarily applied to Taiwan.
These councilors and the media that followed their lead by heavily covering the story have taken overseas research out of context, either out of ignorance or by deliberately omitting the differences in geography, climate, hydrology, environment and other conditions.
It is hard to avoid wondering what political intentions they might have for doing so.
The councilors’ right and power to supervise government officials should be respected, but they should desist from cherry-picking and citing things out of context with no understanding of the science.
If the councilors want to resolve the drought crisis, they should use practical action to help farmers coordinate the available water resources, and support the development of water reclamation and desalination plants, rather than spouting useless rhetoric in the council chamber.
Hsu Jui-yuan is a Tainan resident with a master’s degree in civil engineering.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS