An opinion piece published a few days ago cited parts of a 2016 paper published by researchers from the University of Maryland and other institutions in the US, which said that solar power plants could cause a “photovoltaic heat island” effect.
This issue was picked up by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Tainan city councilors, who used it as a theme for a question-and-answer session.
The councilors stretched the research findings out of proportion by saying the heat island effect created by solar panels is the cause of Tainan’s long-term drought, lack of rainfall and record temperatures.
The KMT councilors who spoke on this issue included Wang Jia-jen (王家貞), Tsai Yu-hui (蔡育輝), Tsai Chung-hao (蔡宗豪), Lin Yen-chu (林燕祝) and Lee Chung-tsen (李中岑).
Without having carefully studied the research methodology, scale and time span of the research paper, they applied its findings to Tainan and denigrated solar energy as a cause of the drought.
The way they distorted the development of solar energy is staggering.
Academics from institutions including National Taiwan University, National Cheng Kung University and Academia Sinica reviewed the research paper and agreed to be interviewed by the Science Media Center Taiwan.
They said that the research was done in an arid desert with conditions quite different from Taiwan’s climate. They said that with such big environmental differences, the research results measured in one place cannot be directly applied to the other.
Meteorologist Peng Chi-ming (彭啟明) said that the drought in southern Taiwan is mainly because several typhoons over the past few years slipped past Taiwan, resulting in less rainfall than the historic average.
The academic community does not agree that the US research findings can be arbitrarily applied to Taiwan.
These councilors and the media that followed their lead by heavily covering the story have taken overseas research out of context, either out of ignorance or by deliberately omitting the differences in geography, climate, hydrology, environment and other conditions.
It is hard to avoid wondering what political intentions they might have for doing so.
The councilors’ right and power to supervise government officials should be respected, but they should desist from cherry-picking and citing things out of context with no understanding of the science.
If the councilors want to resolve the drought crisis, they should use practical action to help farmers coordinate the available water resources, and support the development of water reclamation and desalination plants, rather than spouting useless rhetoric in the council chamber.
Hsu Jui-yuan is a Tainan resident with a master’s degree in civil engineering.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS