A Taichung MRT train on Wednesday crashed into a crane boom that fell onto the tracks, leaving one person dead and 10 injured. The incident has sparked discussion about whether it could have been prevented, and how to avoid such accidents.
The crane boom fell from the top of a 31-floor building and crashed through the noise barrier covering the tracks about 150m from the Feng-le Park Station, and a Taichung Mass Rapid Transit Corp (TMRT) train departing from the station collided with the crane boom.
Station surveillance footage showed that the boom fell onto the tracks at 12:27:04pm. The MRT train stopped at the station at 12:27:05pm, and the platform security guard, who saw the fallen crane boom, shouted to the attendant in the train’s first cabin to halt the train, but she did not notice. The train doors closed at 12:27:22pm and it left the station at 12:27:30pm, hitting the crane boom at 12:27:45pm.
From surveillance footage inside the train and TMRT’s explanation, the MRT attendant, after seeing the obstacle, called the operation control center on a wireless radio and tried to retrieve a key from her bag to open a cover to access the manual control panel, but she fell over as the train crashed.
Many people asked whether in the 41 seconds from when the boom hit the tracks to when the train crashed into it, TMRT could have stopped the train from leaving the station.
City councilors said that the operation control center received 16 automatic warning signals about power system abnormalities in the six seconds after the boom fell onto the tracks, but it did not identify the problem in time.
As the Taichung MRT’s Green Line is operated by a driverless automatic system, TMRT said its trains each have a 2m obstacle-detection pole in front, but an emergency brake can only be triggered when the pole touches an obstacle on the tracks. Although the train attendant and station manager reported to the operation control center, it takes 20 seconds for the center to halt a train. There are emergency stop buttons, an emergency intercom and an emergency door handle in the train cabins, but the train only stops at the next station if the stop button is pressed while it is running, TMRT said.
The company that dispatched the crew operating the crane, Highwealth Construction — which, together with its subsidiaries, had 10 major construction accidents in the past five years, resulting in 10 deaths — is being blamed for the accident. The company’s other construction sites have been ordered to shut down for safety inspections, while the people involved are facing charges of endangering public safety and negligence resulting in death and injury.
However, the accident also highlights flaws in the Taichung MRT system’s design and emergency response mechanism, including the lack of a vision-based obstacle detection system that can extend the detection parameters, the lack of a manual emergency stop button on the platform accessible to station personnel, and flawed standard operating procedures.
TMRT said in a preliminary report on Friday that it would introduce a pointing and calling method — commonly used in Japanese railways and industry to reduce mistakes — and set up a standardized danger gesture for station platform personnel. They would have to stop carriage doors from closing to stall the train leaving the station, to buy time for it to be halted. Train attendants would also be given a designated place to store the key to access the manual control panel.
Local governments have started safety checks on urban rail systems, as well as safety inspections on Highwealth Construction’s construction sites. However, officials must ensure that design flaws are improved, standard operating procedures are revised and practiced, and inspections on construction sites are conducted frequently.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its