A three-year-old girl was killed and her mother was injured when a car hit them as they were crossing at an intersection in Tainan on Monday, a recent example of fatal and near-fatal incidents involving pedestrians in Taiwan.
An SUV hit a woman on a crosswalk in Taoyuan on Nov. 30 last year; the following month a mother and child were killed by a bus while crossing a road at night in Taichung; and on March 13 a woman hit a 77-year-old man crossing a road in Taichung.
Minister of Transportation and Communications Wang Kwo-tsai (王國材) on Wednesday ordered that pedestrian-only crossing intervals — scramble crossing — be implemented at intersections nationwide. This is the most promising proposal to rectify the dangerous conditions pedestrians in Taiwan face, but there are other steps the government should take.
Last year, a CNN report called out Taiwan for its “living hell” traffic. The report cited a Facebook post by Ray Yang (楊威榮), who complained of “nearly getting run over” while in Taiwan after years living in Australia. “Cities in Taiwan share a major issue — a lack of pavements and consistent walkways for pedestrians,” Yang told CNN.
Only 42 percent of roads in Taiwan have sidewalks, CNN reported, citing government statistics. People pushing strollers or using a wheelchair are often forced to use the road to pass transformers, light poles and other obstacles, it said.
It also cited the US Department of State telling visitors to Taiwan to “exercise caution when crossing streets because many drivers do not respect the pedestrians’ right of way,” and the Canadian government as warning people that “motorcycles and scooter drivers [in Taiwan] don’t respect traffic laws. They are extremely reckless.”
There are multiple sources of Taiwan’s traffic woes: Drivers do not respect traffic laws or are not properly taught, police do not properly enforce the laws and there is a lack of proper infrastructure.
In December last year, Wang said that proposed amendments to the Road Traffic Management and Punishment Act (道路交通管理處罰條例) would increase penalties for drivers who do not yield to pedestrians. However, the proposed changes are unlikely to deter dangerous drivers, because they are not likely to be enforced. Even if they are, poor driving habits are so ingrained in Taiwan that many drivers are probably unaware that they are breaking the rules.
To get a better idea of the situation, stand at a busy intersection for 15 minutes. Drivers make diagonal left turns that cut in front of oncoming traffic without yielding, regularly run red lights and often park on crosswalks.
Tackling such behavior requires that every driver be retested. Local governments could rotate through their boroughs and districts, having one area tested over a month before moving on to the next area. Drivers could be given one year to retest before having their license suspended.
Police would also need to ramp up enforcement of traffic violations. They should be at intersections during peak traffic and patrolling the rest of the day. Relying on cameras does not help.
Regarding infrastructure, scramble crossings are a good start. However, every road — except for the narrowest of alleys — should have a sidewalk that is kept clear of scooters and other obstructions.
The government must implement a comprehensive plan to tackle driving and infrastructure problems if it is serious about decreasing the number of fatal traffic incidents. Small changes are not going to make a difference.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS