A class in Taichung Municipal Taichung First Senior High School late last month drew a lot of criticism for naming a booth at the school fair “Hsi Huan Na” (烯環鈉) — which sounded like “indigenous bastard” (死番仔) in Taiwanese. A legislator subsequently revealed that an indigenous student at the school was bullied by his peers in a chatroom after the case broke out.
Racial discrimination continues to take place in Taiwan, and the school incident seemingly reflects a culture of complicity that allows it to happen repeatedly.
In 2020, veteran radio host Luo Hsiao-yun (羅小雲), chairwoman of the Golden Bell Awards’ panel of judges, made “hoh, hoh, hoh, hoh” sounds when announcing that Alian Radio (原住民族廣播電台) was nominated for an award, asking indigenous people in the audience: “Shouldn’t you be making this sound?” Due to protests against her remarks, Lou apologized and resigned.
However, one month later at the Golden Bell Awards ceremony, when a Tao boy in a traditional thong accepted his award, mainstream online media mocked him with headlines such as “showing off his buttocks,” “I’m the most visible of all” and “going butt-naked onstage.”
A lot of people also left offensive, discriminatory and sarcastic comments on the live message board of the event organizer whenever indigenous nominees won awards. The organizer did nothing to stop such discriminatory language from appearing on its official Web site.
US sociologist Douglas Kellner has said that a phenomenon may be a sign. A single incident may reflect not only an individual case, but also a serious common problem in society. The school incident, along with the other discriminatory incidents against indigenous people, reflects a core issue: Is society complicit in perpetuating such racial discrimination?
For the students who came up with the disputed name, why didn’t anyone find something wrong with it? When they bullied an indigenous student in the chatroom, why didn’t anyone stand up to stop the bullying? And when online media mocked the indigenous winner, why didn’t any of their reporters think that they have crossed the line?
From Kellner’s perspective, racial discrimination is no longer a problem in competitions, education, workplace or media, but a problem of society as a whole, and many people in our society remain blind to racial discrimination. Oftentimes, they cannot sense the seriousness of the matter until it creates a public stir.
If Taiwanese think that racial discrimination is an important issue, the Ministry of Education should promote ethnic education in high schools and universities. The Ministry of Culture should have cultural interpreters at major award shows, such as the Golden Bell, who can help hosts explain the significance of the traditional costumes worn by indigenous nominees.
The National Communications Commission should require all electronic and online media to bolster on-the-job training on ethnic literacy for reporters.
If the government sits back and watches racial discrimination occur again and again, then we will all become complicit in allowing mainstream culture to keep on bullying indigenous people. In that case, the goal of building a society that respects cultural diversity would only be empty talk.
Hsu Chih-ming is an assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s Department of Journalism.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS