Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who is vying for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) nomination for next year’s presidential election, has made several controversial remarks in the past week, making him a topic of discussion among local media, political talk shows and even environmental groups.
Despite a few party members having already expressed their intent to run for president, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) on March 22 announced that the party would not be holding a primary for its presidential nomination, but would instead reference opinion polls and make a comprehensive assessment in naming the strongest candidate.
In 2019, Gou lost the KMT’s presidential primary and left the party on bad terms, but he last month officially apologized to the party and announced his desire to run for president, asking the KMT to “give him 30 days” to express his views to the nation. The KMT said it respected his plan.
Gou has since been on an “advice-seeking tour” across the nation, meeting with local politicians and influential figures. He began outlining his policy plans, of which many were highly controversial and some he later apologized for, saying they were poorly expressed.
He said that Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft would no longer encircle Taiwan if he is elected, he would establish a Taiwanese robot industry within three years and use 80,000 robots to fight the PLA if it attacks the nation, that he would eliminate scam syndicates within six months of becoming president, and that the government should be led by CEO-like leaders who can monitor themselves without legislative oversight.
Gou also said that people “will get lung cancer” if they vote for the Democratic Progressive Party, referring to the use of coal-fired power, as the ruling party has a “nuclear-free homeland” policy. He instead suggested building a small modular reactor (SMR) near Kaohsiung’s Banpingshan (半屏山), and suggested that SMRs should be built in every administrative region.
Despite political commentators saying that many of Gou’s ideas are ridiculous, impractical or gaffes, he dismissed the criticism, saying that “it is impossible for me to be so naive, and for my policy ideas to be so careless and unprepared, when I am seeking to run for president.”
However, his comments have raised concerns about his competency, as he seems to lack knowledge of democracy, public governance and reality in Taiwan. AI-based real-time public opinion analysis platform QuickseeK showed a significant spike in online negative public sentiment toward Gou in the past week.
As a few KMT figures have said the party has already decided to nominate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and with the party still ambiguous about when it would announce its final decision, it is no wonder that Gou, who is still not a KMT member, is anxious to prove his popularity and influence by making bold remarks.
Chu yesterday maintained the party’s ambiguity around the KMT’s decisionmaking mechanism, only saying that it would name the best candidate this month. It therefore remains to be seen whether Gou is still in the game, or whether he is being used by the KMT to stall while Hou prepares, diverting criticism that Hou could be a “runaway mayor” like former KMT Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who ran for president in 2020.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS