Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who is vying for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) nomination for next year’s presidential election, has made several controversial remarks in the past week, making him a topic of discussion among local media, political talk shows and even environmental groups.
Despite a few party members having already expressed their intent to run for president, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) on March 22 announced that the party would not be holding a primary for its presidential nomination, but would instead reference opinion polls and make a comprehensive assessment in naming the strongest candidate.
In 2019, Gou lost the KMT’s presidential primary and left the party on bad terms, but he last month officially apologized to the party and announced his desire to run for president, asking the KMT to “give him 30 days” to express his views to the nation. The KMT said it respected his plan.
Gou has since been on an “advice-seeking tour” across the nation, meeting with local politicians and influential figures. He began outlining his policy plans, of which many were highly controversial and some he later apologized for, saying they were poorly expressed.
He said that Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft would no longer encircle Taiwan if he is elected, he would establish a Taiwanese robot industry within three years and use 80,000 robots to fight the PLA if it attacks the nation, that he would eliminate scam syndicates within six months of becoming president, and that the government should be led by CEO-like leaders who can monitor themselves without legislative oversight.
Gou also said that people “will get lung cancer” if they vote for the Democratic Progressive Party, referring to the use of coal-fired power, as the ruling party has a “nuclear-free homeland” policy. He instead suggested building a small modular reactor (SMR) near Kaohsiung’s Banpingshan (半屏山), and suggested that SMRs should be built in every administrative region.
Despite political commentators saying that many of Gou’s ideas are ridiculous, impractical or gaffes, he dismissed the criticism, saying that “it is impossible for me to be so naive, and for my policy ideas to be so careless and unprepared, when I am seeking to run for president.”
However, his comments have raised concerns about his competency, as he seems to lack knowledge of democracy, public governance and reality in Taiwan. AI-based real-time public opinion analysis platform QuickseeK showed a significant spike in online negative public sentiment toward Gou in the past week.
As a few KMT figures have said the party has already decided to nominate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and with the party still ambiguous about when it would announce its final decision, it is no wonder that Gou, who is still not a KMT member, is anxious to prove his popularity and influence by making bold remarks.
Chu yesterday maintained the party’s ambiguity around the KMT’s decisionmaking mechanism, only saying that it would name the best candidate this month. It therefore remains to be seen whether Gou is still in the game, or whether he is being used by the KMT to stall while Hou prepares, diverting criticism that Hou could be a “runaway mayor” like former KMT Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who ran for president in 2020.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics