The government is planning to double subsidies paid to care facility residents with disability level 4 or above to NT$120,000 per year and remove an exclusion clause for wealthy individuals, Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) said on Wednesday. Hsieh announced the plan after the Ministry of Health and Welfare in January said it would expand the Long-term Care Plan 2.0 to include a subsidy for families to enable them to send a family member in need of care to a short-term facility or employ a short-term care assistant for up to 52 days.
The two policies are examples of how the ministry is trying to better meet the needs of families in need of care services. They come as care demand is expected to increase rapidly. The ministry forecasts that the number of people in need of long-term care would climb to 1 million in 2026 from 820,000 last year. The Long-term Care Plan 2.0 was launched in 2017 to create an affordable and accessible long-term care system, and ensure that elderly and disabled people receive better care. It includes subsidies for in-home or facility care services, shuttle bus services, assistive devices, transforming people’s homes into a barrier-free environment and respite care services.
However, Taiwan’s 100,000 care facility residents and 200,000 people being cared for by migrant caregivers were previously excluded. Social welfare groups and lawmakers have championed calls for better services for disabled people and their families, highlighting discrepancies between services covered by the long-term care plan and their actual needs. The main problem is that the health ministry’s plan does not integrate services offered by migrant caregivers under the purview of the Ministry of Labor.
Many affected families have said it is too difficult to find a suitable migrant in-home caregiver — an issue that is exacerbated by regulations that impose waiting periods before families can replace a worker who left their job without prior notice. Many families also distrust residential facilities, thinking that taking care of an elderly family member at home is a matter of filial piety. Despite cultural and language barriers and often insufficient training, hiring a migrant caregiver remains the option of choice for many families, as migrants offer one-on-one services around the clock for a minimum salary of NT$20,000 per month. Hiring a care service that employs Taiwanese professionals costs two to three times that amount, while service is limited to fewer hours. Migrant caregivers often find their duties overwhelming, and there is too little rest and emotional support available to them. The prospect of a job in a factory, for which their average salary is NT$30,000 per month, is tempting for many migrants, while others see their in-home care job in Taiwan as a stepping stone to better employment in a third country.
Meanwhile, many families say respite care services might not be suitable, as it would take a temporary caregiver too much time to learn how to address all the needs of the person they should care for, while other families are not aware that they are eligible for those services. Government data showed that only 5 percent of eligible families booked respite care services last year. While the overall number of migrant workers has returned to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels, the number of social welfare workers, including in-home caregivers, has continued to decrease.
On Wednesday, Hsueh said: “Taiwanese prefer one-on-one 24/7 long-term care services, but if we continue to go in this direction, we will never have enough care workers.” Meanwhile, a Control Yuan report on the long-term care plan said that while the number of care facilities is rising, quality remains uneven, as there is no sufficient monitoring mechanism. The health ministry should address this issue, while continuing to expand the plan. It should also enhance cross-ministerial efforts to integrate services offered by migrant workers into Taiwan’s long-term care architecture.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS