Italian officials have expressed a wish to increase cooperation with Taiwan on the production and export of semiconductors, Bloomberg reported.
The officials also said that Italy might be willing to stop participating in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
Although the report did not name its sources, and said the discussion happened “in private talks,” the government should take it seriously.
The context of the report and the proposal should be analyzed, and Taiwan should deliberate on how to respond.
French President Emmanuel Macron said earlier this month that Europe and France should develop a strategy toward the Taiwan Strait independent of Washington and Beijing.
He demonstrated the pragmatic stance of a “third pole,” trying to maneuver within the tension between the US and China.
Macron was substantially criticized for his remarks. In the face of this, the center-right coalition in Italy began discussing the possibility of replacing France within the EU under the pro-Euro-American banner of “Atlanticism” and “Europeanism.”
In addition to Italian officials’ disparagement of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the European Chips Act was approved by the European Commission on Wednesday last week. In this context, the Bloomberg report should be regarded as credible.
Before Macron’s controversial remarks, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni did not pay much attention to Taiwan. Instead, she attempted to establish closer relations with China.
The situation has changed. With European countries and the US challenging Macron’s move, along with the passing of the European Chips Act, Meloni might have begun calculating the most beneficial stance for her country.
Italy’s reported shift reflects a choice: work with a democratic supply chain that is balanced between Taiwan, the US and Europe, or upgrade the pact with China.
Much seems to be dependent on whether Meloni pulls out of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and all involved parties are likely trying hard to persuade Meloni to make up her mind.
Semiconductors play a significant role in this matter. As Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) plan to establish a fab in Germany has not yet been confirmed, Italy might have been motivated to draw Taiwan closer to its side.
Although TSMC might not be able to promise to build a fab in Italy, the company should consider offering necessary equipment and research-and-design facilities, or at least arrange for Italian engineers to work in Germany.
Given such attention, Italy and Meloni might take more favorable approaches toward Taiwan.
As the government is preparing to establish a representative office in Milan, Taiwan should seize the opportunity to further consolidate relations with Italy.
Meloni’s high approval ratings, pro-US stance and willingness to offer weapons to Ukraine make her the best partner for Taiwan.
The government should take advantage of the situation and work with Meloni to strengthen connections with Italy.
Taiwan can provide incentives for her to convince other officials in Italy and the EU to lean in a similar direction.
It is also worth mentioning that Italy’s flagship aircraft carrier is heading to the Indo-Pacific region.
Italy wants to increase its presence in the international community and have a voice in one of the world’s disputed areas.
As the carrier accommodates fifth-generation F-35 jets, Italy’s ambition to set foot in the region cannot be more clear.
Among G7 nations, Taiwan must work to consolidate relations with France, Germany and Italy. The government should deliberate on whether it is worthwhile using chips as a vehicle for diplomacy.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Emma Liu
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS