Former president and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in a speech at China’s Hunan University on Sunday said that “Taiwan and mainland China belong to one China.” He said “it is a clear fact” that the constitution of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), amended in 1982, stipulates that “Taiwan is part of the sacred territory of the People’s Republic of China.”
Ma’s “one China” stance echoes Beijing’s “one China” principle, demonstrating his willingness to be reduced to the status of an Internet influencer for China’s “united front” warfare that promotes unification with Taiwan, despite the PRC’s insistence that it is the only legitimate government of China, and that the Republic of China (ROC) was overthrown in 1949.
Ma said that “our country” amended the ROC Constitution, so that “our country was divided into two parts — the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area. Both are our Republic of China, both are ‘one China.’”
The ROC Constitution and its Additional Articles only refer to the “free area“ of the ROC. In the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), the Taiwan Area is defined as territory under ROC control and the Mainland Area refers to the territory outside ROC control. Ma’s contention is simply not borne out by this.
According to the ROC Constitution, Ma could say that China, including Mongolia, belongs to the ROC, and should insist that the PRC be absorbed into the ROC.
Taiwan was not mentioned in the PRC constitution promulgated in 1954. The phrase “Taiwan is part of the sacred territory of the People’s Republic of China” was added to the preamble in 1982, an amendment rejected by the ROC at the time.
By quoting from the two constitutions and echoing Beijing’s “one China” principle, Ma deviates from the historical fact that Taiwan has never been a part of the PRC, and the ROC on Taiwan and the PRC in China are two separate political entities.
During his trip to China, Ma has spent much of his time trying to connect Taiwan with China, saying that people on both sides speak the same language and are “all Chinese,” even being moved to tears, speaking in the language of Hunan Province and singing on a TV show. Ma’s behavior would have been viewed as treason by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Ma ignores the fact that more than 80 percent of Taiwanese were born and grew up in Taiwan, including many so called “waishengren” (外省人) — those who came from China with the KMT after the Chinese Civil War, and their offspring. In polls, the overwhelming majority of people in Taiwan — anywhere from 70 to 90 percent — identify as Taiwanese, not Chinese.
In China, Ma has repeatedly quoted Alphonse Daudet’s short story The Last Lesson, about a teacher in Alsace, France, who lamented being forbidden from teaching French, his mother tongue, when the region was under German rule following the Franco-Prussian War. Referring to how Germany and France eventually became partners in the EU, Ma has called on people across the Taiwan Strait to communicate with each other. Ironically, he seems to have forgotten that the KMT prohibited Taiwanese from learning their mother tongues and forced them to learn Chinese history.
He is once again trying to make Taiwanese give up their identity, sovereignty and dignity to embrace “one China.”
Of course most Taiwanese would like to have normal exchanges with people in China and to have peaceful dialogue with the Chinese government, but this must be based on Taiwanese’s democratic determination and free will, not the PRC’s coercion or for any politician’s political interests. This is a lesson Ma must learn.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS