How seriously should we see the fatal shooting of a baboon? Should it be criminalized? It is likely that the case — centered around an animal that last month escaped from the Leofoo Village Theme Park — will remain unsettled even after the investigation has been completed.
The shot that killed the innocent baboon also delivered a grievous injury to Taiwan’s reputation as a country proud of its animal rights protections.
Taiwanese have been so proud of their “no kill” policy on shelter animals, particularly stray dogs, believing that they are far ahead of other countries when it comes to the issue of animal protection.
However, the death of the escaped baboon shows that it has been self-conceit. A bullet has awakened everyone. Taiwan’s animal protection policy, as it turns out, only cares for stray dogs and is blind to other animals. Is Taiwan really that progressive?
It seems that compassion and respect for animals are selective.
When the entire world is engaging with the WHO’s integrated, unifying concept of “one health,” seeking to balance the health of people, animals and ecosystems, is Taiwan keeping in step? More often than not, human beings tend to consider themselves — ignorantly and arrogantly — as the master of all species, but a tiny virus turned the world upside down over the past three years.
When nature strikes back, it will be impossible for humankind to live in peace.
To establish true “one health,” people must respect all lives and cherish the ecosystem.
They should monitor their own behavior when interacting with animals and the environment.
“One health” is not merely a concept. It requires action to make it work. This concept can be practiced in reality and its influence can reach every corner of the world. People would witness and experience “one health” if they abandon ignorance and complacency. To create a truly beautiful, harmonious Formosa, Taiwanese must live alongside animals and ecosystems on an equal footing.
Johnson Chiang is a former president of the World Veterinary Association.
Translated by Emma Liu
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS