Against the backdrop of mounting tensions between the US and China, Taiwan finds itself at the epicenter of a rapidly changing regional dynamic. As one of the most likely flashpoints for conflict, it is of paramount importance that Taiwan devises a strategy to defend itself. However, there is a growing chorus in Taiwan for acquiescence to foreign threats in the name of opposing war. This is a perilous narrative that would leave the nation vulnerable to invasion and devoid of its inherent capability to defend itself against China.
Advocates of this sentiment suggest that Taiwan’s fortification of its defense mechanisms is provocative and risks inflaming tensions with China. This flawed reasoning disregards Beijing’s inexorable ambition to annex Taiwan and expand its authoritarian influence in the region. Surrendering Taiwan’s ability to defend itself only serves to embolden China in its pernicious objectives. Moreover, in the absence of a prepared defense, Taiwan could be forced to capitulate and negotiate peace in the event of a conflict.
However, the likelihood of negotiations with the Chinese Communist Party being successful is questionable, as the regime has demonstrated a lack of credibility by failing to honor Hong Kong’s promised autonomy, and by systematically violating human rights in Xinjiang and Tibet — just to name a few examples in its long history of disregarding previous promises.
The only recourse for Taiwan to withstand Chinese aggression is to collaborate with allies, bolster national defense and prepare for war. This entails maintaining a robust military presence and pursuing economic and social prosperity, while deepening ties with those who oppose China’s authoritarian expansion.
Preparedness for war does not equate to actively seeking it out, but rather signifies readiness to deter aggression and reduce the likelihood of conflict. Succumbing to this “anti-resistance sentiment” is counterproductive and a guise for increasing the probability of war. Taiwan must be primed and alert to defend itself against all forms of aggression.
Taiwan’s leaders must heed the dangers of this sentiment and undertake decisive measures to strengthen the nation’s defenses against China. This involves working in conjunction with allies to form a strong coalition against Chinese aggression and investing in Taiwanese military capabilities.
The stakes are high, and Taiwan cannot afford to be complacent in the face of Chinese belligerence. Only by exhibiting a resolute defense and a steadfast commitment to resistance can Taiwan ensure its sovereignty and security.
Lien Yi-ting is a graduate student at the Harvard Kennedy School. She served as a spokesperson for President Tsai Ing-wen’s re-election campaign office and has worked at the Presidential Office and the National Security Council.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS