Against the backdrop of mounting tensions between the US and China, Taiwan finds itself at the epicenter of a rapidly changing regional dynamic. As one of the most likely flashpoints for conflict, it is of paramount importance that Taiwan devises a strategy to defend itself. However, there is a growing chorus in Taiwan for acquiescence to foreign threats in the name of opposing war. This is a perilous narrative that would leave the nation vulnerable to invasion and devoid of its inherent capability to defend itself against China.
Advocates of this sentiment suggest that Taiwan’s fortification of its defense mechanisms is provocative and risks inflaming tensions with China. This flawed reasoning disregards Beijing’s inexorable ambition to annex Taiwan and expand its authoritarian influence in the region. Surrendering Taiwan’s ability to defend itself only serves to embolden China in its pernicious objectives. Moreover, in the absence of a prepared defense, Taiwan could be forced to capitulate and negotiate peace in the event of a conflict.
However, the likelihood of negotiations with the Chinese Communist Party being successful is questionable, as the regime has demonstrated a lack of credibility by failing to honor Hong Kong’s promised autonomy, and by systematically violating human rights in Xinjiang and Tibet — just to name a few examples in its long history of disregarding previous promises.
The only recourse for Taiwan to withstand Chinese aggression is to collaborate with allies, bolster national defense and prepare for war. This entails maintaining a robust military presence and pursuing economic and social prosperity, while deepening ties with those who oppose China’s authoritarian expansion.
Preparedness for war does not equate to actively seeking it out, but rather signifies readiness to deter aggression and reduce the likelihood of conflict. Succumbing to this “anti-resistance sentiment” is counterproductive and a guise for increasing the probability of war. Taiwan must be primed and alert to defend itself against all forms of aggression.
Taiwan’s leaders must heed the dangers of this sentiment and undertake decisive measures to strengthen the nation’s defenses against China. This involves working in conjunction with allies to form a strong coalition against Chinese aggression and investing in Taiwanese military capabilities.
The stakes are high, and Taiwan cannot afford to be complacent in the face of Chinese belligerence. Only by exhibiting a resolute defense and a steadfast commitment to resistance can Taiwan ensure its sovereignty and security.
Lien Yi-ting is a graduate student at the Harvard Kennedy School. She served as a spokesperson for President Tsai Ing-wen’s re-election campaign office and has worked at the Presidential Office and the National Security Council.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS