The Ministry of Justice has proposed amending Article 1085 of the Civil Code by repealing parents’ right to punish their children. This has caused an uproar among parents and teachers, as it leaves a gap regarding the disciplining of children. Can legal power replace family ties and kinship?
Ever since the Ministry of Education banned corporal punishment in 2006, the dynamic between teachers and students in the educational system has changed. Now when teachers see students misbehaving, they would rather turn a blind eye than stop them, because if students are “traumatized” by any form of discipline, teachers can end up in hot water.
A teacher’s duties go beyond teaching and answering students’ questions; they also involve teaching them correct conduct and behavior. Restricting a teacher’s right to discipline deprives students of the opportunity to learn proper conduct. If parents are also restricted from instilling discipline, would children still have a sense of ethics, morality or responsibility, or carry the right legal and family values?
Discipline is different from domestic violence or child abuse. The latter two involve improper emotional control and mental issues in adults, while discipline is about teaching children the right conduct, manners and behavior. This should be the responsibility of parents, not the justice ministry.
There was an incident in Kaohsiung in which a father, after being informed that his son had skipped more than 100 classes in less than one semester, questioned his son about his behavior. When the son, a high-school student, talked back, the father punched him. Enraged, the son sued his father for domestic violence. The court sentenced the father to three months in prison for breaching the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保護法). The punishment is not commutable to a fine, but the father has a right to appeal.
Even though the proposed measure has children’s interests at heart to protect them from abuse, I do not think that the law played the role it should have, because it is unlikely that the student in question will stop playing hooky just because his father has been sent to prison.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Rita Wang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations