French police have confirmed that China’s overseas “police service stations” were behind cyberattacks against a Taiwanese Mandarin Learning Center in the European nation. This is another example of Beijing bullying Taiwanese organizations, as well as a show of contempt for other countries’ sovereignty and for international laws and norms.
L’Encrier Chinois, a Chinese-language school that opened in 2005 in Paris, became the second Taiwanese Mandarin Learning Center in France in 2021. The school was targeted by at least three cyberattacks last year, which were reported to French police, who discovered that the attacks originated from China’s overseas police stations.
Overseas Community Affairs Council Minister Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) said that similar cyberattacks by Chinese police service stations have been reported in many countries. An investigation report by Safeguard Defenders, a human rights non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Spain, said that China has at least 102 police service stations in 53 countries.
Although Beijing says the stations were established to help Chinese living abroad to access administrative services, the stations were also found to be assisting Chinese police in covert operations, such as “persuading” Chinese fugitives to return home and monitoring Chinese immigrants.
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took power in 2012, the number of Chinese asylum seekers has surged from 15,362 to 107,864 in 2020, data from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees showed. The overseas stations have served as extension organizations for China’s “Fox Hunt” and “Sky Net ” operations targeting Chinese dissidents living abroad to stop their activism under the guise of returning Chinese suspects to China to face criminal charges.
The Safeguard Defenders report said that Beijing claimed 230,000 fraud suspects were “persuaded to return” to China from April 2021 to July last year. However, there is evidence that Chinese police used tactics such as threats, harassment, detention or even imprisonment of family members in China on targets who refuse to comply.
Chinese overseas police stations have become a matter of concern around the world. Many countries, including the US, Canada, Japan, Italy, France, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands, have launched investigations and some stations were ordered to close.
Expressing deep concern, FBI Director Christopher Wray told a US Senate hearing that it was outrageous that the Chinese government would attempt to set up a police presence in the US, saying it “violates sovereignty and circumvents standard judicial and law enforcement cooperation processes.”
Through those overseas police stations, China is not only employing extrajudicial means to reach targets for law enforcement, but also to carry out political persecution abroad, as well as to spread its influence and propaganda overseas.
Last month, in a protest against China’s illegal overseas police stations, NGO China Human Rights presented evidence that some overseas Chinese who participated in a welcoming ceremony for President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) during her transit in the US in 2019 were harassed and even beaten by suspected Chinese overseas police. This incident should serve as a warning for Tsai, especially as she sets off today for her trip to Central America, with stopovers in the US.
The attack on Taiwan’s Mandarin Learning Center in France is just the tip of the iceberg, as Beijing moves to expand its transnational policing operations in non-Chinese communities. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Overseas Community Affairs Council have issued alerts to Taiwanese overseas. The bigger challenge for the international community is to detect and eliminate this Chinese transnational authoritarian threat to human rights, international law and democracy.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has