Together with air, water is arguably the planet’s most important natural resource. Functioning water systems are one of the technological pillars of civilization, which often makes a water crisis a matter of life or death.
Today, about 2 billion people lack access to safe drinking water, and about half the world’s population experiences severe water scarcity for at least part of the year. Our limited freshwater resources are overburdened by growing populations and water-thirsty economies. By 2030, global water demand is expected to have exceeded the sustainable supply by 40 percent. As demand for water grows and temperatures rise, water scarcity is to threaten more lives and livelihoods — and thus the stability of societies around the world.
How can we turn the tide so that water empowers communities, secures economies and keeps the planet livable? As with global public goods such as a clean environment, there is a tendency to focus on the costs of improvement today, rather than on the greater long-term benefits of investing in the preservation of natural resources. The water sector today is underfinanced and chronically short of capacity to meet demand.
Illustration: Mountain People
However, if we want to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of ensuring clean water and sanitation for everyone, we must increase global spending on water fourfold, to more than US$1 trillion per year, or about 1.21 percent of global GDP. We also must make up for the US$470 billion we lose every year through flood damage and poor irrigation.
By protecting the environment and the climate, every cent invested in the water sector boosts our economies, now and in the future.
When the European Investment Bank in December last year provided a 200 million euros (US$217 million) loan to Jordan to finance a desalination plant on the Red Sea and a pipeline to the capital, Amman, Jordanian Minister of Planning and International Cooperation Zeina Toukan described these projects as crucial for water security and comprehensive economic development.
We all need to adopt similar thinking about how we value and manage water.
As with many other challenges, the public sector cannot fill this large investment gap alone. Businesses have an important role to play.
Estimates by CDP, a nonprofit organization that collects environmental-impact data, show that more than US$300 billion of business value is at risk globally if no action is taken to address water scarcity. Yet it would cost only one-fifth of that total, or about US$55 billion, to tackle the problem.
If businesses deploy new technologies to reduce their water consumption and to exploit wastewater as a source of energy, heat, nutrients and materials, they can reduce their environmental footprint and free up more water for use by others.
The CDP estimates such “water-related opportunities” at US$711 billion, reflecting not just savings on water use, but also the growth of long-term potential markets in water-smart technology and the benefits of better community relations.
Because water is cheap in most parts of the world, businesses often have little incentive to invest in saving water or in boosting the efficiency of water-intensive production processes. To persuade the private sector to focus on water-system preservation, we first need to start thinking of money spent on water as a real investment, rather than as a cost that can never be recovered.
Second, the right value must be assigned to this water to create the necessary incentives for users and businesses to use it more efficiently, and for preservation to be economically rewarding. In the case of water, this requires a delicate balancing act, because affordable access to drinkable water and sanitation is a recognized human right — which means it is nonnegotiable.
Third, global cooperation and new cross-border programs to mobilize greater investments in water would overcome market failures, and prevent water from being politicized and weaponized.
This week’s UN Water Conference in New York, the first such gathering since 1977, is a unique opportunity to discuss water security and tackle the crisis head-on, as well as to acknowledge that water investment is as critical to a sustainable and just economy as is clean-energy investment.
We can establish new guidelines for fixing the water cycle and ensuring a more holistic approach to sustainable development everywhere, from the Netherlands and Luxembourg to Nigeria and Laos. We must also find more ways to incentivize water financing from public and private sources that are willing to wait for their investments to bear fruit.
Water is what is to carry the SDGs across the finish line. We must finally start recognizing it as a fundamental part of our investment portfolios, and put it at the center of our economic policies.
Ambroise Fayolle is vice president of the European Investment Bank. Henk Ovink is the Dutch special envoy for international water affairs.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations