The National Policy Foundation, sponsored by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), recently held a forum called “The Effect on Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Foreign Policy Toward Taiwan Following the Two Sessions.”
Chao Chun-shan (趙春山), a member of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) braintrust on cross-strait relations, used the forum to repeat KMT policy like a broken record, claiming that if put into office, the KMT would start “a new dialogue” with China.
He is naive to believe that reopening dialogue across the Taiwan Strait would revive the congenial relationship seen during Ma’s administration.
It would certainly not put an end to China’s air force incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone. Unless Chao is suffering from serious memory loss, he is deceiving the public, because Chinese warplanes have been conducting long distance training exercises since 2013.
Chao is aware that the US would continue suppressing China, a change in international relations direction from Ma’s presidency. At this critical juncture, if Taiwan becomes ambiguous in its attitude toward China, it risks becoming the thorn in the side of democratic allies. Those who lack realistic views of international politics think that dialogue is the answer to every problem.
If that is the case, then there would have been no wars throughout history. The most famous dialogue in history is nothing but the Melian Dialogue, a dramatization of the negotiations between the Athenians and the Melians before the siege. The two parties failed to reach a consensus after the dialogue, and the Athenians wiped out the Melians.
In East Asian history, the last ruler of the Southern Tang Dynasty, Li Yu (李煜), thought that if he could appease the Song forces, then there would be peace for his country. As the Song armies prepared to invade, Li immediately asked to talk. Zhao Kuangyin (趙匡胤), who later became the founder of the Song dynasty, replied: “No more of this talk. As there is only one kingdom, I could not allow another to share it with me.”
The same example can be seen in modern history. Former British prime minister Neville Chamberlain thought that he could achieve “peace for our time” by talking to Adolf Hitler. Despite receiving a rowdy homecoming from the crowd after signing the Munich Agreement, Chamberlain’s talk failed to keep Hitler from invading Poland the following year, which led to World War II.
Former US president Bill Clinton also thought that the US could achieve peace with North Korea through dialogue. Unfortunately, this opened a can of worms for the US, for North Korea has learned that the US would capitulate whenever it throws a tantrum, providing further chances to extort aid from Washington.
The KMT should know this better than anyone since the it has fallen for CCP schemes after multiple negotiations and peace talks. Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) blamed the US for the loss of the “mainland” because Washington forced him to negotiate with the CCP. He would turn in his grave if he knew that droves of KMT members were now in favor of holding peace talks.
KMT icon and Republic of China (ROC) founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) once discussed the futility of talk.
“To rely on benevolence alone to influence the Europeans in Asia to relinquish the privileges they have acquired in China would be an impossible dream,” he said.
Ironically, after the end of World War II, Europe relinquished many privileges acquired through treaties, including the handover of Hong Kong. Recent crackdowns and changes have proved that it was China that renounced its “50 years unchanged” pledge.
While history has shown that the US and Europe have been reliable, it is downright impossible and naive to negotiate with an autocratic country with a record of breaking promises.
Prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the US and Europe were making no progress with Russia. French President Emmanuel Macron thought that he could dissuade Russian President Vladimir Putin with his silver tongue. The joke was on Macron when Putin turned on him and ordered the invasion.
While Macron only suffered a bruised ego, Taiwan could easily lose its sovereignty and people.
In response to Chao’s preposterous stance, and to Ma — a former president who possesses the nation’s highest secrets and is about to visit China — Taiwanese should slam them for their quasi-treason and refrain from being deceived by these “pro-dialogue” advocates.
Tommy Lin is director of Wu Fu Eye Clinic and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Rita Wang
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS