German Minister of Education and Research Bettina Stark-Watzinger is scheduled to arrive in Taiwan today. It is the first time in 26 years that Taipei is hosting a minister from Germany.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Sunday visited Japan, his second visit in 12 months, and German broadcaster Deutsche Welle has revealed the draft of Berlin’s of new China policy.
All of this shows that Germany is endeavoring to engage with nations in Asia and the Pacific. The purpose, obviously, is to reduce its reliance on China.
Stark-Watzinger’s visit to Taiwan would be a historic move that has been delayed for years, German daily newspaper Der Tagesspiegel reported.
Of course, a German minister does not visit Taiwan by chance. It is clear that the visit is aimed at greasing the wheels regarding Germany’s access to chips, and Berlin does not want Singapore to get in its way.
At the same time, the Central News Agency published an editorial a few days ago, criticizing how the EU wants Taiwan’s chips but refused to bolster its economic ties with the nation.
Germany often sets the direction and the EU follows, so Taiwan should seize the opportunity and find out what Germany needs, using its advantage to promote a trading partnership between the EU and Taipei.
First, since Taiwan has long been a leader in advanced semiconductor manufacturing technology, Stark-Watzinger’s visit is unlikely to merely be an educational and research exchange. Instead, one of her intentions would be to confirm Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) plan to establish a fab in Germany.
Although Germany and the Free State of Saxony are willing to subsidize TSMC, EU participation is also needed to execute the plan. Taiwan must take full advantage of this by asking Germany to facilitate a trade agreement between Taiwan and the EU.
Second, all nations have started to train their own China experts due to concerns about Beijing’s assertive behavior.
In its updated foreign policy, the UK highlighted the need to enhance its research capabilities to study China. Stark-Watzinger’s visit conveys the same message. Taiwan should play an important role in helping the West train their own experts on China.
Third, when he was in Japan, Scholz discussed semiconductors and green hydrogen energy, aiming to deepen Germany’s collaboration with Japan. Taiwan should initiate such conversations with Germany to cope with challenges brought by China.
Last, economic security is one of the most significant concerns for G7 nations, and their priority is to consolidate the supply chain to counter economic coercion, state-led access to technology and behaviors that are contrary to free-market principles.
Taiwan’s performance in these aspects has been excellent, and it should keep up the good work to improve ties with Germany.
German foreign affairs specialist and member of the Bundestag Roderich Kiesewetter once said that Germany’s foreign policy has long been founded upon three deceptions: inexpensive security from the US, inexpensive supply chains from China, and inexpensive oil and gas from Russia.
Today, Germany is striving to address its dependence on those three countries, and it has come to Taiwan regardless of China’s threats and its “one China” policy.
Taipei should make the most of this, establishing a supply chain based on mutual trust, while asking Germany to lobby for a Taiwan-EU trade agreement. With Germany taking the lead, Taiwan should have a better chance of success.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Emma Liu
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
Former Hong Kong media magnate Jimmy Lai (黎智英), who on Monday was sentenced to 20 years in jail for his role in the 2019 Hong Kong democracy movement and “colluding with foreign forces,” once called on members of the US government for support in his struggle against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Speaking to a forum at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in July 2019, Lai, speaking about the US having the moral authority over the CCP, said: “It’s like they are going to battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in
RSS