Former Control Yuan president Wang Chien-shien recently announced that he would run in next year’s presidential election, saying that his reason is that “Taiwan and China are on the brink of war.”
If elected, he would enable China to achieve the goal of peaceful unification with Taiwan by 2025, Wang said.
Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member who has announced his intention to run for president, has voiced his support for Wang.
An online poll showed that 40 percent of respondents think that this would make pan-blue voters “switch camp,” but it remains to be seen how many senior KMT members would throw their weight behind these moves.
Wang’s “unification” plan is the inevitable result of anti-US, pro-China narratives promoted by the KMT. Outside the party’s echo chamber, Wang’s cross-strait policy proposal appears to come from a parallel universe.
However, such proposals are no surprise to people who have been paying close attention to the foreign and cross-strait policy schemes put forward by the KMT and pro-unification supporters in the past few years.
To the KMT’s understanding, cross-strait tensions are caused by the governing Democratic Progressive Party, the US, Japan, Europe and other democratic countries, while China is the “benign patriarch” that seeks peace and prosperity. As Taiwan keeps “provoking” China by bolstering its military capabilities and diplomacy, the threat of war naturally looms when it does not adopt the KMT’s policy of befriending China and rejecting the US.
It is only natural that a fossil like Wang says something “clever” and ludicrous like “the only solution to Taiwan’s predicament is unification” with China.
A Mainland Affairs Council poll in October last year showed that only 1.7 percent of Taiwanese support “speedy unification.” With this in mind, how would Wang push for unification by 2025?
The poll also showed that only 8.7 percent support unification “in the future,” while a similar poll by National Chengchi University’s Election Study Center showed that 7.2 percent of Taiwanese support “unification” and only 1.2 percent support “speedy unification.”
How deluded and out of touch with the public are the so-called “blue elite” and “blue intelligentsia” to come up with such proposals? Perhaps their proposals are no longer made with the interests of Taiwanese in mind.
Wang has not only set the goal of unification, he even came up with a procedure. Next year, he would set up a special team to incorporate opinions from different factions and negotiate with China, and sign a peace deal by 2025, completing the “unification” agenda, he said.
Wang’s concept of “unification negotiations” is essentially the same as Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “democratic negotiation” plan.
Under that plan, Beijing says it would invite Taiwanese “representatives” to China for negotiations. Wang’s plan is even more considerate, as he suggests to hold voluntary negotiations in Taiwan and send the results to China for “political negotiations,” while bearing in mind China’s most prized “one China” principle.
If major players in the KMT such as its chairman, Eric Chu (朱立倫), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and others do not have the courage to reject the delusions spouted by Wang, Chang, former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and 1.2 to 1.7 percent “speedy unification” supporters, they will eventually be marginalized by the majority of Taiwanese.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS