Former Control Yuan president Wang Chien-shien recently announced that he would run in next year’s presidential election, saying that his reason is that “Taiwan and China are on the brink of war.”
If elected, he would enable China to achieve the goal of peaceful unification with Taiwan by 2025, Wang said.
Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member who has announced his intention to run for president, has voiced his support for Wang.
An online poll showed that 40 percent of respondents think that this would make pan-blue voters “switch camp,” but it remains to be seen how many senior KMT members would throw their weight behind these moves.
Wang’s “unification” plan is the inevitable result of anti-US, pro-China narratives promoted by the KMT. Outside the party’s echo chamber, Wang’s cross-strait policy proposal appears to come from a parallel universe.
However, such proposals are no surprise to people who have been paying close attention to the foreign and cross-strait policy schemes put forward by the KMT and pro-unification supporters in the past few years.
To the KMT’s understanding, cross-strait tensions are caused by the governing Democratic Progressive Party, the US, Japan, Europe and other democratic countries, while China is the “benign patriarch” that seeks peace and prosperity. As Taiwan keeps “provoking” China by bolstering its military capabilities and diplomacy, the threat of war naturally looms when it does not adopt the KMT’s policy of befriending China and rejecting the US.
It is only natural that a fossil like Wang says something “clever” and ludicrous like “the only solution to Taiwan’s predicament is unification” with China.
A Mainland Affairs Council poll in October last year showed that only 1.7 percent of Taiwanese support “speedy unification.” With this in mind, how would Wang push for unification by 2025?
The poll also showed that only 8.7 percent support unification “in the future,” while a similar poll by National Chengchi University’s Election Study Center showed that 7.2 percent of Taiwanese support “unification” and only 1.2 percent support “speedy unification.”
How deluded and out of touch with the public are the so-called “blue elite” and “blue intelligentsia” to come up with such proposals? Perhaps their proposals are no longer made with the interests of Taiwanese in mind.
Wang has not only set the goal of unification, he even came up with a procedure. Next year, he would set up a special team to incorporate opinions from different factions and negotiate with China, and sign a peace deal by 2025, completing the “unification” agenda, he said.
Wang’s concept of “unification negotiations” is essentially the same as Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “democratic negotiation” plan.
Under that plan, Beijing says it would invite Taiwanese “representatives” to China for negotiations. Wang’s plan is even more considerate, as he suggests to hold voluntary negotiations in Taiwan and send the results to China for “political negotiations,” while bearing in mind China’s most prized “one China” principle.
If major players in the KMT such as its chairman, Eric Chu (朱立倫), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and others do not have the courage to reject the delusions spouted by Wang, Chang, former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and 1.2 to 1.7 percent “speedy unification” supporters, they will eventually be marginalized by the majority of Taiwanese.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Rita Wang
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS