Global markets were last week hit by the collapse of several regional banks in the US and uncertainty over the future of Credit Suisse Group AG in Switzerland. While the problem of each bank has its own cause and should be viewed individually rather than systemically, it is clear that the aggressive interest rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve and other major central banks over the past year have played a key role in triggering the crisis, as their monetary tightening aimed at taming inflation is having hazardous effects on financial stability.
Within one week, three US banks — Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank — collapsed, after their poor balance sheet management made them vulnerable to the rate hikes. Meanwhile, 11 major US banks provided a US$30 billion lifeline to First Republic Bank to tide it over the liquidity crisis, and Credit Suisse, Switzerland’s second-largest bank, on Thursday obtained a lifesaving US$54 billion credit line from the Swiss National Bank.
The developments put authorities around the world on alert for signs of contagion, as fears of more bank collapses surfaced last week. Financial stocks lost billions of dollars in value, and speculation swirled that the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee might after a meeting this week announce a smaller-than-expected rate hike, or even keep its rate unchanged, to stabilize financial markets.
The Fed initially misjudged the spike in inflation as transitory, but reversed course in March last year and has since raised its rates by 450 basis points. Now it faces a dilemma: Inflation outlook remains uncertain, but raising the rates to rein it in might cause more financial instability.
Unfazed by the turmoil, the European Central Bank (ECB) on Thursday stuck to its plan to lift rates by 50 basis points. The bank’s accompanying statement showed its determination to ensure that inflation falls to its 2 percent medium-term target. Yet, the ECB only provided limited guidance regarding future policy decisions, taking into account financial stability concerns.
In Taiwan, the Financial Supervisory Commission last week said that the domestic banking sector remains resilient, with strong capital and liquidity positions, as local lenders’ exposure to troubled US regional banks and Credit Suisse is limited.
However, as the risks in the global financial sector are increasing and the external environment is becoming more complicated, Taiwanese market participants have started to speculate about future rate hikes, especially at a meeting of central bank policymakers this week.
Since March last year, the central bank has raised its rates by 62.5 basis points, a much milder pace than its US and European peers.
However, the risk of higher inflation is likely to linger, after the government announced that it would raise electricity rates from next month, and as it is considering a pay raise for public-sector workers. In the first two months of this year, the consumer price index rose 2.74 percent from a year earlier, and the gauge is unlikely to retreat below 2 percent this year, the National Development Council said. Therefore, the central bank’s monetary policy should still prioritize curbing inflation and keeping inflation expectations stable. It is not yet time to stop raising interest rates.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS