Honduran President Xiomara Castro wrote on Twitter on Tuesday that she had instructed her foreign ministry to establish relations with Beijing, which would require severing ties with Taipei. Honduran Minister of Foreign Affairs Eduardo Enrique Reina said the decision was “pragmatic,” telling the Guardian it was driven by the country’s US$20 billion in external and internal debt. The newspaper said the announcement came shortly after Honduras said it was negotiating with Beijing over construction of a new dam.
Castro’s decision was criticized in Taiwan and Honduras, with Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) saying the move would harm a decades-long friendship, and urging Castro not to let Honduras fall into China’s debt trap.
Wu’s warning is not without merit. The Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty news service in August last year said that China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) “has left it with a list of risky debtors around the world including Argentina, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, Venezuela, Zambia and Iran.” Pakistan now owes China US$77.3 billion in debt, it said.
When countries default on their BRI loans, China can take over ports, mines and infrastructure, which it has done on many occasions in other places. However, with so many non-performing loans piling up, China is facing a major debt crisis. It is facing a crucial inflection point after nearly 10 years of runaway lending under the guise of the BRI that has been exacerbated by rising inflation and other factors, and “Beijing could be looking to streamline and scale back its hallmark initiative,” the news service said.
On Jan. 16, a Forbes report said that China is facing its highest level of debt in the 27 years since Beijing first began to track such statistics. “China’s debt overhang far exceeds the burdens facing the United States. As of the middle of last year, China’s relative debt burden stood 40 percent higher than America’s,” it said.
It is understandable that Honduras — which the CIA World Factbook describes as the second-poorest country in Central America — would turn to China out of desperation. However, given China’s debt burden, it is unclear how much Beijing would be willing to lend Honduras in the long term. Even if Honduras secures more loans, it would likely be unable to repay them, which would threaten its sovereignty and put even more burden on its people.
Former Honduran ambassador to Taiwan Rafael Sierra on Tuesday wrote on Twitter that trade with Taiwan has been favorable to his country because of Taiwanese demand for melons, shrimp, coffee and other Honduran products. He also cited Costa Rica’s experience after it switched ties to Beijing, saying that China’s larger market does not necessarily result in more demand for Central American products.
Meanwhile, Honduran farmers who receive technical assistance with agriculture and aquaculture would face an uncertain future if the Taipei-run International Cooperation and Development Fund were to withdraw from the country, he said.
The loss of ties with Honduras could harm the Central American country more than Taiwan, and the heaviest impact would be felt by the common Honduran. This is one reason Taiwan should strive to salvage the diplomatic relationship, which Wu said it is committed to doing.
However, Taiwan must be cautious about throwing money at an economically struggling country in a bid to retain ties. It would be foolhardy to engage China in a bidding war over an ally. Such a hollow relationship would be of no benefit to anyone.
Even if Taiwan were not recognized by any country, it would continue to be self-governing. Its diplomatic relationships must be based on mutual respect and shared values. Taiwan’s focus should be on strengthening economic, military, educational and cultural exchanges with like-minded countries, whether they are allies or not.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS