The military refers to Penghu County as “offshore” and Kinmen and Lienchiang (Matsu) counties as “outlying islands.” In the past, young men across Taiwan drew lots to determine where they would be stationed, with Kinmen and the Matsu archipelago considered undesirable assignments.
For Matsu, Jyuguang Township (莒光) includes two major islands, Dongjyu (東莒) and Sijyu (西莒), as well as smaller islets.
When I was doing education and promotional work across Taiwan in the Young Women’s Working Brigade, I visited Matsu four times, visiting Beigan (北竿), Nangan (南竿) and Dongyin (東引) townships, as well Dongjyu and Sijyu, along with other islands such as Liang (亮島) and Gaodeng (高登), with each tour lasting three months.
Due to the geography and environment, living conditions in Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu have long been inferior to those in Taiwan proper. Two decades ago, when I arrived in Matsu on a landing platform, I was appalled by the living conditions.
Not only was there limited water supply, the water was of poor quality. The entire women’s brigade showered together without hot water, while dead bugs were occasionally found in the water. At the time, I considered it a luxury to have water to shower at all.
As food sources were limited, we ate whatever the brigade ate, but as there were often military officers heading up education and promotional work there, the army would usually offer an extra dish, which would be something that is common in Taiwan proper, but difficult to come by on an outlying island lacking variety.
About six years ago, when I was assigned to the Army Command Headquarters, I again visited Matsu. This time, I found that the facilities and food had greatly improved due to advancements in technology, transportation and the efforts of top officials.
Minister of Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) was then head of the Army Command Headquarters. He has always regarded outlying islands as a top priority for provision and supply, which should be the same with all the former ministers, even though resources are still not up to par with those on Taiwan proper.
On Sunday a photograph posted on social media showed a message written on a beach, purportedly on Sijyu, saying that the soldiers there had to eat canned food and instant noodles because they had no fresh meat.
I asked a friend fulfilling his military service in Matsu about the incident. He said it was due to the breakdown of a commercial boat that usually delivers meat to the islet, and deliveries had also been affected by weather. Without other food sources, the army used canned pork as a substitute.
From the incident, we can see the efforts and hardship that soldiers stationed on outlying islands must deal with. It is also understandable how top officials might have created a misunderstanding among the public, and that the pressure that public censure has inflicted on the national army.
The soldiers with a complaint about the food situation should have taken it up with their superiors first.
I believe top officials and commanders in the army would address the problem upon receiving the complaint. In this way, we would have avoided a public misunderstanding, while maintaining troop morale, especially by preventing people from spreading articles with scandalous titles like “combat power down for national army.”
Chang Ling-ling is a retired colonel in the armed forces reserves. She is a resident of New Taipei City.
Translated by Rita Wang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS