Feb. 24 last year will forever be recalled as the day when Russia started its brutal, unprovoked and illegal invasion of Ukraine. This was and remains a case of pure aggression and a clear-cut breach of the UN Charter. This war is neither “just a European issue,” nor is it about the “West versus the rest.”
It is about the kind of world we all want to live in: No one is safe in a world where the illegal use of force — by a nuclear power and permanent member of the UN Security Council — would somehow be “normalized.” That is why international law must be enforced everywhere to protect everyone from power politics, blackmail and military attack.
One year on, there is a risk that people become inured to the images of war crimes and atrocities that they see — because there are so many; that the words we use start to lose their significance — because we have to repeat them so often; that we get tired and weaken our resolve — because time is passing and the task at hand is hard.
This we cannot do. Because every day, Russia keeps contravening the UN Charter, creating a dangerous precedent for the whole world with its imperialist policy. Every day, Russia keeps killing innocent Ukrainian women, men and children, raining down its missiles on cities and civilian infrastructure. Every day, Russia keeps spreading lies and fabrications.
For the EU and its partners, there is no alternative to staying the course of our “triple strategy” of supporting Ukraine, putting pressure on Russia to stop its illegal aggression and helping the rest of the world cope with the fallout.
This is what we have been doing for one year now — and successfully so. We have adopted unprecedented sanctions, cut our dependency on Russian fossil fuels and in close collaboration with key partners reduced by 50 percent the energy revenues the Kremlin gets to finance its aggression.
Working together, we have also mitigated the global ripple effects with food and energy prices declining, partly thanks to the EU-Ukraine Solidarity Lanes and to the Black Sea Grain Initiative.
It is not enough to say that we want Ukraine to be able to defend itself — it needs the means to do so. So, for the first time ever, the EU has supplied weapons to a country under attack. Indeed, the EU is now the leading provider of military training for Ukrainian personnel so they can defend their country. We are also offering significant macrofinancial and humanitarian aid to support Ukrainians, and we have decided to respond positively to Ukraine’s request to join the EU.
Finally, we are working to ensure accountability for the war crimes that Russia has committed.
Ukraine has shown its remarkable resilience, partly thanks to this support, and Russia has grown more isolated, thanks to global sanctions and the international condemnation by the overwhelming majority of states in the UN General Assembly.
Our collective goal is and remains a democratic Ukraine that prevails, pushing out the invader, restoring its full sovereignty and, with that, restoring international legality.
Above all, we want peace in Ukraine, a comprehensive and lasting peace that is in line with the UN Charter and international law. Supporting Ukraine and working for peace go hand in hand
If Russia’s illegal aggression were to succeed, the repercussions would spread globally. The risk of regional hot spots in Asia, such as the Taiwan Strait, the South and East China seas, and others, to turn into open conflicts would increase. That is why Europe and its partners in the Asia-Pacific region have to take a joint stand. The support of many Asian partners at the UN and elsewhere for the principles of territorial integrity, sovereignty and international law has been crucial.
However, the reverse is also true: The EU is fully committed to uphold international law everywhere, not just in Ukraine. We work for peace and security around the world, including in the Asia-Pacific region.
We need to be clear that Russia’s actions are responsible for the economic shock waves in terms of food, energy and fertilizers. We have always exempted food and fertilizers from EU sanctions, and we are monitoring any possible unintended effects.
More broadly, the Russian invasion has underlined the need for Europe and Asia to avoid excessive dependencies. We must reinforce our collaboration to build more resilient and inclusive economies, protect our democracies and strengthen social cohesion.
History and justice are on the side of Ukraine, but to accelerate history and achieve justice, we need to amplify our “triple strategy.”
We know this is a collective task. That is why the EU is counting on all its partners to act in a spirit of joint responsibility and solidarity, and to ensure that aggression fails and international law prevails.
Josep Borrell is high representative of the EU for foreign affairs and security policy and vice president of the European Commission.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS