To figure out what is going on with COVID-19, a good place to start is in the sewers. Since early in the pandemic, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority has been testing inflows to its Deer Island Wastewater Treatment Plant in Boston Harbor for the virus. The readings provide a remarkably detailed picture of the course of the pandemic — in Boston and its suburbs, at least.
Epidemiologists still are not absolutely certain what these wastewater readings from Boston and elsewhere mean. A bunch of studies have been conducted comparing them with other measures of COVID-19 prevalence, and the overall conclusion seems to be that virus concentrations in sewage do a pretty good job of predicting and reflecting the spread of COVID-19, but that the topic needs more study.
I suspect that the Boston-area readings, which are unique in being available in an almost unbroken series back to the middle of March 2020, provide a much more reliable measure of actual virus prevalence than confirmed-case numbers based on COVID-19 tests, which were barely available in spring 2020, and are now mostly conducted at home and never reported to authorities.
One thing the sewage readings show is that last winter’s wave of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 wave was COVID-19’s peak so far and by far. Another is that the disease was much more prevalent during this winter’s wave, which crested around New Year’s Day, than during the Boston area’s initial encounter with COVID-19 in 2020. Zooming in on April 2020 and December last year makes that clearer:
At first glance, this is a little discouraging. After almost three years, in an area where an estimated 95 percent of the population has received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, far more people appear to have become infected with the virus this winter than in the scary days of spring 2020, with the viral signal running from two to nine times stronger in December last year.
However, there is an encouraging side. More than 2,000 COVID-19 deaths were reported in April 2020 in the three counties — Middlesex, Norfolk and Suffolk — that send their sewage to the Deer Island plant; about 200 were reported in December last year. That is still a significant number, and with about 93 percent of Massachusetts COVID-19 deaths in December among those 60 and older, it is an indication that more needs to be done to protect the elderly and get them life-saving medications. However, it is also an indication that because of vaccinations, previous exposures to COVID-19 and changes in the virus, the disease has become much, much less deadly than when it first arrived.
Here is the long view, using statewide COVID-19 death estimates by date of death from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health because they are available on a daily basis and, with Boston-area counties making up almost two-thirds of the state’s population, they should mostly reflect the same virus waves seen in the sewage data.
In April 2020, COVID-19 killed many people in eastern Massachusetts, which was among the US regions hit earliest and hardest by the first wave of the disease. Then the virus receded quickly. Given how much higher the wastewater viral signal climbed in subsequent COVID-19 waves, it seems highly unlikely that this spring 2020 decline was caused by so-called herd immunity, in which so many people have already had the disease that it stops spreading. Instead, it was probably mostly the result of people in Boston and its suburbs hunkering down at home, with warmer weather helping out some, too. The “crush the curve” strategy of the early days of the pandemic actually did crush the curve, although it did not eradicate the virus.
Since the arrival of the Omicron variant in late autumn 2021, the Boston-area viral signal has mostly stayed well above its April 2020 peak, which can probably be attributed to the more infectious and immunity-evasive nature of Omicron and its subvariants, and the fact that people are not hunkered down at home anymore. But, again, the disease has become much less deadly. Hunkering down at home is much harder to justify now than it was in April 2020.
Another way of putting it is that the huge difference between the initial reaction to the virus and the current stance seems more or less justified by changes in its virulence. For an immunologically naive population COVID-19 was (and probably still is) a dangerous disease, much deadlier than seasonal flu and other common respiratory ailments.
Now that almost everyone has been exposed to it through vaccines, infections or both, it is much less dangerous — but so infectious that it is harder to avoid, too, which is problematic for those still at high risk.
None of this is exactly news, of course, but it is somehow reassuring to see it backed up by what has been turning up in Boston’s sewers.
Justin Fox is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering business. A former editorial director of Harvard Business Review, he has written for Time, Fortune and American Banker.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The