In 2004, Buddhist Master Hsing Yun (星雲) wrote a letter to fellow Buddhists during the Lunar New Year, saying that Taiwanese were originally from provinces in China, which means the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are essentially Chinese.
On Jan. 6, I visited Buddhist organization Fo Guang Shan to explain to Hsing Yun the notion that Taiwanese are not Chinese, and I asked Abbot Hui Lun (慧倫) to pass on historical documents, my works and other materials.
The documents I gave Hsing Yun were great in detail and number.
I gave him two simple examples of evidence:
First, page 60 of Volume 3 of Lien Heng’s (連橫) The General History of Taiwan (台灣通史) says that in the 23rd year of Emperor Qianlong’s (乾隆帝) reign — 1758 — Taiwanese were ordered to change their surnames to Han Chinese surnames.
Second, Volume 15 of General History, “The Book of Settlement and Appeasement,” says that “the domesticated savages were gradually assimilated into the Han culture. To fall in line with the national system, they were ordered to shave their heads and were given Han surnames.”
If Taiwanese were from provinces in China, why would they need to change their surnames? This proves that Hsing Yun’s theory that Taiwanese are Chinese is false.
Hui Lun must have passed the information on to Hsing Yun, because on May 13, 2010, when Hsing Yun met with Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), then-chairman of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, in Beijing, he said: “Both sides of the Taiwan Strait are Chinese,” but the next day, when he met with Wang Yi (王毅), who was director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office at the time, he did not make the same statement again.
He only used the word “compatriots,” and did not mention Taiwanese or Chinese.
In Buddhist terms, he must have repented.
The evidence is sufficient to show that it is false for Taiwan’s history textbooks to claim that “Taiwanese are part of an immigrant society from China.”
If Taiwanese were truly Chinese immigrants, they would have already had Han Chinese surnames, and therefore would have had no need to change them.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor in the Department of Business Administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Rita Wang
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
With the addition this year of Sweden and last year Finland to NATO, the Baltic Sea has been dubbed a “NATO lake” by some analysts. A glance at a map shows that is largely (but not completely) true — the coastline has a couple of slivers of Russian territory. The rest of the coastal littoral is in NATO hands: Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark. Russia controls a bit of coast between Lithuania and Poland because of its strange enclave of Kaliningrad. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in control of the far eastern corner of the Baltic Sea