In 2004, Buddhist Master Hsing Yun (星雲) wrote a letter to fellow Buddhists during the Lunar New Year, saying that Taiwanese were originally from provinces in China, which means the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are essentially Chinese.
On Jan. 6, I visited Buddhist organization Fo Guang Shan to explain to Hsing Yun the notion that Taiwanese are not Chinese, and I asked Abbot Hui Lun (慧倫) to pass on historical documents, my works and other materials.
The documents I gave Hsing Yun were great in detail and number.
I gave him two simple examples of evidence:
First, page 60 of Volume 3 of Lien Heng’s (連橫) The General History of Taiwan (台灣通史) says that in the 23rd year of Emperor Qianlong’s (乾隆帝) reign — 1758 — Taiwanese were ordered to change their surnames to Han Chinese surnames.
Second, Volume 15 of General History, “The Book of Settlement and Appeasement,” says that “the domesticated savages were gradually assimilated into the Han culture. To fall in line with the national system, they were ordered to shave their heads and were given Han surnames.”
If Taiwanese were from provinces in China, why would they need to change their surnames? This proves that Hsing Yun’s theory that Taiwanese are Chinese is false.
Hui Lun must have passed the information on to Hsing Yun, because on May 13, 2010, when Hsing Yun met with Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), then-chairman of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, in Beijing, he said: “Both sides of the Taiwan Strait are Chinese,” but the next day, when he met with Wang Yi (王毅), who was director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office at the time, he did not make the same statement again.
He only used the word “compatriots,” and did not mention Taiwanese or Chinese.
In Buddhist terms, he must have repented.
The evidence is sufficient to show that it is false for Taiwan’s history textbooks to claim that “Taiwanese are part of an immigrant society from China.”
If Taiwanese were truly Chinese immigrants, they would have already had Han Chinese surnames, and therefore would have had no need to change them.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor in the Department of Business Administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Rita Wang
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
A survey released on Wednesday by the Taiwan Inspiration Association (TIA) offered a stark look into public feeling on national security. Its results indicate concern over the nation’s defensive capability as well as skepticism about the government’s ability to safeguard it. Slightly more than 70 percent of respondents said they do not believe Taiwan has sufficient capacity to defend itself in the event of war, saying there is a lack of advanced military hardware. At the same time, 62.5 percent opposed the opposition’s efforts to block the government’s NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.6 billion) special defense budget. More than half of respondents — 56.4
RSS