Every year, local governments across the nation decorate the streets with light installations to celebrate the Lantern Festival, with Taipei this year hosting the main event. However, one of the lantern displays in the capital has triggered debate and criticism.
The work is composed of major characters from the Chinese classic Journey to the West (西遊記). What was striking is its depiction of a white rabbit — to represent the Year of the Rabbit — sitting in a boiling twin-side hot pot surrounded by the Bull Demon King and Tang Sanzang. Many visitors found the “rabbit boiling” scene disturbing and appalling.
The installation’s organizer, the Chinese Artistic Lantern Association, said that the rabbit was “not being boiled,” but is “bathing happily in a hot spring,” and that the overall scene was meant to convey harmony and happiness. Nonetheless, a few days later, the rabbit was removed from the installation, with many Internet users joking that it had “finally been gobbled up.”
Another work that attracted criticism was a large installation near the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall depicting two large Chinese dragons perching on a gate. Many Internet users found it gaudy and said it was a classic example of “ROC aesthetics.”
The phrase “ROC aesthetics” originally referred to the style of buildings constructed after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retreated to Taiwan. As most of the buildings were built in haste and without any attention to aesthetics, the term has come to refer to anything that looks jumbled, loud, tawdry and influenced by gaudy elements of Chinese culture. More often than not, it stands for bad taste and a lack of aesthetic quality. In short, an aesthetic fiasco.
These examples of ROC aesthetic catastrophes are a result of the extreme distortion of aesthetics, history and memory under the autocratic rule of the past KMT regime. Textbooks were filled with information about Chinese geography, history and literature. As a result, Taiwanese were more familiar with aspects of China than with the land on which they were born and live. Students are likely to be more familiar with scenes in Journey to the West than they are with Taiwan’s indigenous folklore.
The legacies and aesthetic catastrophes left behind by the regime extend to the marginalization of Taiwan’s local languages, an overabundance of political slogans, and numerous statues of former presidents Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) littered across the nation, as well as untidy, chaotic streetscapes.
Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) is perhaps the epitome of ROC aesthetics, with his tawdry slogans, politically laden singing, as well as the horrendous lantern festival held during his tenure, with visitors comparing it to a “mourning hall” with its large lotus installations and a statue of Han.
For festivals, those in power are given the discretion and judgement to put the finest art on display. In this case, the annual lantern festival and the works presented should be reflective of Taiwanese aesthetics, ideology and history. Even though it is true that when it comes to aesthetics, “beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” the overall principle should be presenting aspects closer to Taiwan’s local culture, history and values, instead of focusing on Chinese cultural elements.
As Wendell Pierce once said: “The role of culture is that it’s the form through which we as a society reflect on who we are, where we’ve been, where we hope to be.” The lantern festival is not just a festival, but a vision and reflection of Taiwanese society.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS