Every year, local governments across the nation decorate the streets with light installations to celebrate the Lantern Festival, with Taipei this year hosting the main event. However, one of the lantern displays in the capital has triggered debate and criticism.
The work is composed of major characters from the Chinese classic Journey to the West (西遊記). What was striking is its depiction of a white rabbit — to represent the Year of the Rabbit — sitting in a boiling twin-side hot pot surrounded by the Bull Demon King and Tang Sanzang. Many visitors found the “rabbit boiling” scene disturbing and appalling.
The installation’s organizer, the Chinese Artistic Lantern Association, said that the rabbit was “not being boiled,” but is “bathing happily in a hot spring,” and that the overall scene was meant to convey harmony and happiness. Nonetheless, a few days later, the rabbit was removed from the installation, with many Internet users joking that it had “finally been gobbled up.”
Another work that attracted criticism was a large installation near the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall depicting two large Chinese dragons perching on a gate. Many Internet users found it gaudy and said it was a classic example of “ROC aesthetics.”
The phrase “ROC aesthetics” originally referred to the style of buildings constructed after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retreated to Taiwan. As most of the buildings were built in haste and without any attention to aesthetics, the term has come to refer to anything that looks jumbled, loud, tawdry and influenced by gaudy elements of Chinese culture. More often than not, it stands for bad taste and a lack of aesthetic quality. In short, an aesthetic fiasco.
These examples of ROC aesthetic catastrophes are a result of the extreme distortion of aesthetics, history and memory under the autocratic rule of the past KMT regime. Textbooks were filled with information about Chinese geography, history and literature. As a result, Taiwanese were more familiar with aspects of China than with the land on which they were born and live. Students are likely to be more familiar with scenes in Journey to the West than they are with Taiwan’s indigenous folklore.
The legacies and aesthetic catastrophes left behind by the regime extend to the marginalization of Taiwan’s local languages, an overabundance of political slogans, and numerous statues of former presidents Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) littered across the nation, as well as untidy, chaotic streetscapes.
Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) is perhaps the epitome of ROC aesthetics, with his tawdry slogans, politically laden singing, as well as the horrendous lantern festival held during his tenure, with visitors comparing it to a “mourning hall” with its large lotus installations and a statue of Han.
For festivals, those in power are given the discretion and judgement to put the finest art on display. In this case, the annual lantern festival and the works presented should be reflective of Taiwanese aesthetics, ideology and history. Even though it is true that when it comes to aesthetics, “beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” the overall principle should be presenting aspects closer to Taiwan’s local culture, history and values, instead of focusing on Chinese cultural elements.
As Wendell Pierce once said: “The role of culture is that it’s the form through which we as a society reflect on who we are, where we’ve been, where we hope to be.” The lantern festival is not just a festival, but a vision and reflection of Taiwanese society.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS