A Facebook post by Taipei Deputy Mayor Lee Ssu-chuan (李四川) on Sunday prompted a public debate on whether more public trash cans should be set up.
People commenting on the post said that Taipei having so few public trash cans is inconvenient for its residents, to which Lee commented: “I feel the same, thanks.” As the debate heated up, Lee on Wednesday said that the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection would assess the issue.
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) said a survey by the city’s Research, Development and Evaluation Commission in 2020 showed that 70 percent of residents favored more public trash cans. His administration would implement garbage disposal policies based on professional assessments, he added.
Many public trash cans were removed per order of the administration of then-Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) in 2015, reducing their number to about 1,800 from 3,100. City officials at the time said illegal disposal of household trash bags frequently caused the cans to overflow. In 2020, another 500 trash cans were removed, with officials citing COVID-19 prevention as the reason.
Ko on Tuesday said that instead of adding trash cans, the city government should educate Taipei residents. People should reduce the amount of trash they produce and take what they produce during the day back home, Ko said. He on Thursday added that managing public trash cans is costly, as they need to be emptied every two hours, adding that it is impossible to install a surveillance camera at every trash can to ensure that people do not dispose of household waste.
Former Taipei deputy mayor Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) said Taipei’s garbage bag fee policy, as well as recycling efforts, have been successful. However, she said there was a painful transition period after the number of public trash cans was reduced, but residents increasingly disposed of all their garbage at home, making Taipei cleaner than many global cities. Taipei should not reverse course on its trash can policy based on popular opinion, she said.
A borough warden said more public trash cans would encourage people to dispose of their household trash in them, as they would seek to avoid buying garbage bags. Residents expressed differing opinions online, with some voicing concern about increased workload for cleaning workers, trash overflow and sanitary problems, while other residents, as well as city councilors, said that the illegal disposal of trash by a few people should not dictate a policy that affects the convenience of all residents.
Issues regarding public trash cans are common in major cities. Local authorities have dealt with them differently, based on their priorities. Tokyo has removed most public trash cans for security reasons after a terror attack on a Tokyo subway station in 1995, and the policy is widely accepted by its residents. A Bloomberg report in 2019 said that Japanese culture valuing cleanliness contributed to the policy’s success. It also said that the Japanese government implemented policies to promote low-waste lifestyles, including removing paper towels in public restrooms, while urging people to bring their own. Trash cans have slowly been reintroduced at train stations and in parks, mostly to reduce littering by foreign tourists.
NBC in 2019 reported that Washington had deployed “trash detectives,” who sought to identify people who disposed of household trash in public trash cans by rummaging through the garbage, and was running campaigns to educate the public about correct disposal.
Taipei’s garbage disposal problem is not about the number and locations of public trash cans; it is about educating the public about reducing waste. The issue needs to be discussed comprehensively among city departments, as well as the private and nonprofit sectors, to encourage residents to adopt low-waste lifestyles.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS