Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the pride of the nation, has recently become a villain to residents of Tainan’s Annan District (安南).
In 2017, TSMC announced plans to build the world’s first 3-nanometer fab in Anding District (安定). While the project was once welcomed by residents of Tainan, it has since become a source of controversy.
The new fab requires a huge amount of electricity to operate. To meet TSMC’s surging electricity demand, plans are under way to construct a 1.2 gigawatt gas power station near a residential area in Annan District.
More than 10,000 Annan residents have signed a petition opposing the power plant’s construction.
Locals fear that the power plant will worsen air pollution in the region, which is already severe. In Tainan, average concentrations of toxic PM2.5 pollution — particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers — are already about four times higher than the WHO standard. The planned location of the power plant is within a few kilometers of communities, schools and a hospital.
Moreover, residents are worried about potential gas explosions resulting from the construction of pipelines in the area. Environmentalists have also raised concerns that the site is home to protected species, such as the grass owl.
The case has garnered significant local media attention, but TSMC hides behind the scenes, as if the controversy were unrelated to it. Yet as the planned power plant’s biggest customer, TSMC is central to the story.
TSMC’s failure to stand up for the residents of Annan is merely the latest example of the company’s delayed transition to renewable energy.
Worldwide, TSMC lags behind its competitors when it comes to renewable energy usage. In 2021, renewable energy accounted for just 9 percent of TSMC’s overall electricity consumption, compared with 20 percent for Samsung and 80 percent for Intel.
At the same time, TSMC is working toward its climate commitments at a pace that does not match its role as an industry leader. In 2020, TSMC was the first semiconductor company to join RE100 and targeted 100 percent renewable energy by 2050.
However, in the first year of joining the global initiative, TSMC’s renewable energy ratio increased by only 2 percent. TSMC’s target of 100 percent renewable energy use by 2050 leaves much space for the company to fool around with empty words and false actions.
As a RE100 member, TSMC must stand with residents of Annan and oppose the construction of the planned gas power plant. This case foreshadows many more to come. TSMC’s electricity usage in Taiwan is forecast to increase about threefold between 2020 and 2030.
Taiwan’s renewable energy generation is insufficient to meet rising demand. In addition to purchasing offshore wind energy via corporate power purchase agreements, TSMC must diversify its own renewable energy portfolio, and increase direct investment in renewable energy and self generation, especially in the form of rooftop solar panels on its buildings.
A greater commitment to renewable energy, as well as support for the local community in rejecting the planned power plant, would serve as vital proof of TSMC’s determination regarding energy transition.
Lawmakers on Jan. 9 passed legislation offering tax credits to chipmakers such as TSMC to foster research and investment in advanced technologies. The energy-intensive semiconductor industry is likely to remain the most strategically important sector in Taiwan for years to come.
However, for too long, TSMC and the industry as a whole have hidden behind the government, demanding large amounts of cheap electricity and water.
It is time for TSMC and other manufacturing giants to take greater responsibility for Taiwan’s net zero future and show that they are serious about achieving an energy transition that benefits all of Taiwan, including residents of Annan.
Tracy Cheng is a campaigner in the Greenpeace Taipei Office.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo. Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more
RSS