Criticisms of corruption, a poorly managed bureaucracy and uninformed, unprincipled or unaccomplished policy in China are often met with harsh punishments. Many protesters in the “blank paper movement,” for example, have been disappeared by the authorities.
Meanwhile, the WHO has asked China to provide data on its COVID-19 situation, with the Chinese government choosing to disseminate propaganda instead.
The first amendment of the US Constitution, written in 1791, prohibits the US government from abridging the freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition, or religion. More than 200 years later, China, the world’s second-largest economy, still lacks the freedoms of speech and the press, among others.
A democratic government of the people, by the people and for the people would listen to people’s complaints, as power originates from people. Freedom of speech is essential to achieve that purpose.
On the contrary, an autocratic government, which derives its power from a dictator, would not hesitate to suppress people’s voices and ignore their concerns.
It has been reported in China that some people who had received three doses of the Sinovac Biotech COVID-19 vaccine have died, while some unvaccinated people have survived COVID-19 infection.
Although there is no statistical data to confirm its scientific merits, the efficacy of one or two doses of the Sinovac vaccine has consistently been shown to be much lower than that of mRNA vaccines in all age groups. Therefore, it is scientifically puzzling that earlier studies have said three doses of the Sinovac vaccine matches the efficacy of mRNA vaccines.
That Sinovac’s inactivated vaccine does not provide effective protection against the Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 supports the argument that such vaccines might divert the immune system toward multiple targets, compromising its resilience against the mutated virus.
China and the WHO should find out the facts and quickly supplement the vaccines currently on offer in China with mRNA vaccines to save lives.
As former US president Thomas Jefferson said: “Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom.”
Only weak people are afraid of truth. Truth makes people, and consequently a country, strong.
The ills and grievances of a society cannot be treated if truth is not revealed. Journalists serve as the eyes of the public. Without freedom of the press, society can hardly be managed properly, as problems can be swept under the rug and lessons from past mistakes cannot be learned.
Since the beginning of this year, the term “human mine” has been circulating on the Internet among Chinese dissidents. This disturbing word in its darkest meaning has to do with live organ harvesting.
A 15-year-old high-school student named Hu Xinyu (胡鑫宇), carrying the same rare blood type as that of a high-ranking Chinese official, disappeared from his school campus in October last year. Concurrently, a eulogy to retired Chinese official Gao Zhanxiang (?占祥), who recently died of COVID-19, explicitly described how he had had numerous organ transplants. Suspicions have been expressed online how these stories reflect a horrifying picture of the rampant organ harvesting “business” in China.
Laws are the standard operating procedures of a society, which accumulates wisdom from aspirations, ideas and mistakes.
Crimes against humanity must be punished and laws must be enforced to prevent them from happening again. Unfortunately, an autocratic government simply wants to cover them up and pretend “there is no there there.” As a result, several serious human right issues in China have not been properly addressed. Would this be similar to a pressure cooker ready to explode? The truth will come out in the end.
In the meantime, tearing down China’s cyberspace “iron curtain” by using satellite communication or other means has become ever more urgent to save lives, protect human rights and dismantle autocracy. Only truth will set the country free.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of physics.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS