Westerners have spent two decades wondering why the Russian people have fallen under the spell of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Diplomats, historians, economists and pundits have all failed to provide a satisfying explanation, but where academics and strategists have failed, perhaps the denizens of Sesame Street, from Kermit the Frog to Elmo, might succeed.
It was 1996. My homeland was in the midst of “shock therapy” — the rapid liberalization and privatization of its economy by decree, after the Soviet Union’s fall — and I was at Princeton University working on my doctorate.
One day, a report about Russia on CNN caught my attention. Unusually, it was not about a killing or business takeover or an oligarch’s rise or fall — negative coverage delivered with a holier-than-thou tone that never failed to rankle. Instead, it was a seemingly positive story: The Muppets were headed to Moscow.
Illustration: Yusha
Listening to the CNN host’s arrogant commentary, my relief quickly gave way to frustration. The establishment of a Sesame Street in Russia was not, apparently, an example of cultural cross-pollination, enabled by the country’s opening. Rather, Miss Piggy and Big Bird would ensure that US democratic sensibilities took root in the hearts and minds of children across the vast post-Soviet space — not just in Russia, but also in Estonia, Ukraine, Georgia and other former Soviet republics.
I changed the channel.
A children’s television show, defined by its positive messages about learning and sharing, was being twisted into propaganda, presented as a form of pedagogical salvation, and used as yet another declaration of the US’ Cold War victory.
However, Russia had its own rich culture, which included not only Leo Tolstoy and the Bolshoi Theatre, but also Good Night, Little Ones!, a Soviet children’s show as clever and warmhearted as Sesame Street.
Fortunately, the team behind Sesame Street did not succumb to the attitude of moral superiority and cultural contempt that pervaded US news reports and was likely internalized by many ordinary Americans.
On the contrary, according to a new book by Natasha Lance Rogoff — who, in the early 1990s, was an executive producer in charge of bringing the Muppets to Russia — the story of the show’s formation for Russian audiences was one of genuine cultural cooperation, not condescension or conquest.
In Muppets in Moscow: The Unexpected Crazy True Story of Making Sesame Street in Russia, Lance Rogoff does not shy away from the story’s political thread. She openly admits that the US Agency for International Development and then-US senator Joe Biden “spearheaded congressional support for an international Sesame Street,” touting the Muppets as “ideal ambassadors to model democratic values and the benefits of a free-market economy to children in the former Soviet Union.”
She also said that “translating Sesame Street’s ebullient and idealistic outlook to Mother Russia was not only incredibly difficult, but also incredibly dangerous.”
Lance Rogoff’s narrative includes bizarre, sordid and all-too-human details about the morbid racketeering of the early post-Soviet years, when journalists and businesspeople were murdered on spec and Miss Piggy could be embraced as a role model for the utterly ruthless.
Her rationalizing, normalizing and modernizing of the post-Soviet system reminded me of David Remnick’s insights, in his 1994 book Lenin’s Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire, into how Mikhail Gorbachev’s perestroika transformed Russia.
Perhaps most important, Lance Rogoff shows that, even if Russia’s Sesame Street was fundamentally a US show, it was not about the US. It certainly was not designed to serve as US propaganda.
Instead, it depicted basic human values like friendship and communication — as much for the Russians and Americans who put the show together as for viewers across the former Soviet Union.
Watching Sesame Street while on a visit to Moscow in 1996 — not long after seeing that CNN report — I was pleased to encounter a generous, sweet and well-produced show, which contained tie-in stories from the US original, as well as unique stories with Russian puppets.
The show’s creators had clearly worked hard to develop characters that would resonate with Russians, from the problem-solving orange monster Kubik to the imaginative pink Muppet Businka. Zeliboba — a fuzzy, red-nosed house spirit, dressed in a leaf-covered cloak — was probably the most interesting (and certainly the most polarizing).
Lance Rogoff does sometimes fall prey to cliche. There are too many “Boris and Natasha” moments, with Russians being depicted as cartoonish stereotypes — absurd, bumbling, affected and heavily accented.
For example, one of the female tycoons involved in the show, Irina Borisova, clicks toward a meeting late in Christian Louboutin stilettos. The late Boris Berezovsky, who was approached for funding, calls “Bik Burd,” an “i-cone” of US culture, “as famous as Elvis Pray-esly.”
Nonetheless, Lance Rogoff deserves praise not only for her storytelling, but also for her perseverance and devotion, without which Russian Sesame Street would not have happened. That would have been a loss for Russian children.
As Yuliya Borisova said when she decided to offer funding, “every self-respecting individual understands that it’s time to do something for Russian children, but unfortunately, very little gets done — except talk.”
At a time when Russia was “changing so quickly” — and was “still very violent” — she believed that a “show like Sesame Street could model for our people how to live in a peaceful society.”
The key, as Lance Rogoff understood, was to show, not tell — to act in good faith, with decency and humanity, rather than delivering contemptuous, self-aggrandizing lectures.
In the 1990s, Russians were mimicking all things American, but they were also deeply conflicted, as reflected in the debates Lance Rogoff describes over Sergei Rachmaninoff and rock and roll. Russian culture is marked by extremes, and the oscillation between imitating Western models and violently rejecting them is no exception.
Russian children watched Sesame Street for nearly 15 years — until 2010. Lance Rogoff says it was taken off the air because Putin no longer saw any use for it. That many other cultural collaborations were also ended at about the same time supports her case. Putin had decided that Russian culture must be of and by Russians — and only he could decide what Russianness meant.
In the 1990s, Russian society was so shattered by the breakdown of the communist order that it lost touch with its own values. That did not mean it was going to become a US knockoff. Sesame Street worked because it embodied universal values. Would the Russian reality be different today if more Americans had understood this?
Nina Khrushcheva, a professor of international affairs at The New School, is the coauthor (with Jeffrey Tayler), most recently, of In Putin’s Footsteps: Searching for the Soul of an Empire Across Russia’s Eleven Time Zones.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS