The Ministry of Digital Affairs on Dec. 5 last year listed TikTok and Douyin, the Chinese version of the video sharing app, as products “that endanger national cybersecurity.” The ministry also announced restrictions on the use of the apps on government devices and on the premises of government agencies.
This raises the question of whether TikTok and Douyin should also be banned on school campuses. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which has posted on TikTok as part of election campaigns, said such restrictions amount to “speech control,” and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that not everything should be about ideology.
Many young people also think that looming regulations on the apps are a matter of freedom and civil rights. They say there is no need for government interference and that they should be allowed to judge for themselves.
Due to its proximity to China, Taiwan faces a greater military threat from Beijing than any other nation.
However, many Taiwanese, who have become accustomed to living in freedom, do not think about needing to be prepared for danger in times of peace.
While an opinion poll showed that 60 percent of the US public are in favor of a full-scale TikTok ban and Japan is planning to implement a “security investigation” mechanism to restrict suspicious Chinese apps, including TikTok, many Taiwanese are happy to sit in the front row of China’s misinformation campaigns without worrying in the slightest.
FBI Director Christopher Wray has said that TikTok gives rise to “national security concerns.”
While TikTok is not available in China, Douyin has been called the app’s “spinach version,” as it is educational and offers limited services. Chinese children under the age of 14 are only allowed to use the app for 40 minutes a day, and can only watch “patriotic” or educational videos dealing with topics such as science experiments and museum exhibitions. TikTok, aimed at the rest of the world, is an addictive “opium version” that keeps children hooked for hours at a time.
Wray also said that Chinese companies have to do whatever Beijing tells them to do, potentially turning them into tools of the Chinese government.
This is worrying enough in itself.
Even before the US took notice, the Indian government in June 2020 temporarily banned TikTok on national security grounds. It did so because TikTok was suspected of stealing information from users’ devices without their knowledge, possibly including confidential data such as passwords, credit card information and sensitive e-mails.
Should TikTok be banned on school campuses? Do young people have sufficient ability to distinguish between true and false information? Has Taiwan underestimated the lengths to which China will go to infiltrate its society, eventually leading Taiwanese into the trap of its pro-unification influence operations and brainwashing?
While governments around the world are doing their best to prevent Chinese infiltration through TikTok, Taiwanese, who are threatened by China every day and are close to the brink of war, do not take this issue seriously enough and even think that the government is too nosey.
Meanwhile, certain political parties have the habit of speaking up for China. Taiwan has for nine consecutive years ranked first in the world for disinformation attacks.
Given this unenviable position, Taiwanese should take this national security issue more seriously.
Lin Han is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS