In response to the increasing competition and confrontation between the US and China, the US military has been strengthening its deterrence against its Asian rival.
Notably, to strengthen the defense of the western Pacific first island chain, the US has quietly allowed Taiwan, Japan and South Korea to develop their indigenous cruise or ballistic missiles with a range of more than 1,000km.
As well as strengthening these three countries’ defense capabilities, this development shows how their geographical location allows them to work closely with the US’ national security agencies.
For example, South Korea has long been threatened by North Korea’s nuclear weapons. In recent years, with the assistance of the US as well as its own diligent research and development efforts, South Korea has developed the Hyunmoo missile series.
Among the four types of missile in the series, the Hyunmoo-3 has a range of up to 3,000km, which is more than enough to reach anywhere in the Korean Peninsula. As for the Hyunmoo-4, its ability to carry an earth-penetrating warhead gives it a strong deterrent effect against North Korea’s underground missile and nuclear weapons facilities.
Taiwan has for decades been under military threat from China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). In the early years, due to its own technical limitations as well as restrictions imposed by the US, Taiwan did not have the military hardware needed to carry out attacks at source — pre-emptive strikes.
However, times have changed. Thanks to years of effort by Taiwan’s armed forces, plus the intensified strategic rivalry between the US and China, the armed forces are reportedly in possession of the Hsiung Feng IIE cruise missile, whose 1,000km range is a deterrent against the PLA.
Japan is the US’ most important ally in the Asia-Pacific region, but it has in recent years suffered increasingly frequent harassment by the PLA.
To maintain its basic power of national defense, Japan plans to modify its existing Type 12 surface-to-ship missile by extending its range from 200km to 1,500km.
This would not only defend its southwestern islands, but also help lessen the US’ burden of defending the first island chain.
Faced with China’s increasing military threat and its continued challenge to the longstanding US-dominated order in the first and second island chains, the US is not only striving to widen its lead over the PLA in military technology, but has also tacitly allowed Taiwan, Japan and South Korea to possess or develop cruise or ballistic missiles with a range of more than 1,000km.
The geostrategic position of these three countries has risen amid the intensified rivalry between the US and China.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Julian Clegg
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS