After the plagiarism scandals and allegations in the run-up to last month’s local elections, the hot topic ahead of a by-election in Taipei’s third electoral district is the issue of “black gold,” that is, bribery and affiliation with criminals. The Cabinet and the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have proposed draft amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法) to bar those with criminal records for certain crimes from running for office. The public, tired of inter-party mudslinging, would surely welcome a “clean election.”
According to Article 26 of the act, people who have committed and been sentenced for the crimes of insurrection, foreign aggression, corruption or interfering with others’ voting rights through threats of violence or other illegal means are barred from standing in elections, but those convicted of other crimes are allowed to run for office, after serving their prison term.
The Cabinet and the DPP have drafted amendments to ban people convicted of offenses related to organized crime, money laundering, firearms, drugs or vote-buying from running in national and local elections. Those convicted of national security breaches, including contravening the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) or the National Security Act (國家安全法), and felonies with sentences of more than 10 years in prison would also be barred.
It is hoped that the amendment will take effect before the 2024 legislative and presidential elections.
People convicted of certain crimes are already prohibited from being candidates in legislation specific to those crimes, for example the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法) and the Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例). The proposed amendments would set higher ethical standards for all potential national and local public officials.
Eligibility to run in an election is protected by the Constitution, and convicts deserve a chance to reintegrate into society after serving their sentence. So expanding election regulations should be a rigorous process and more consensus should be sought from the public. Besides, commitment to holding a “clean election” by political parties would be a more crucial factor or, more precisely perhaps, a challenge.
Local elections have been influenced by “black” — gangsters and organized criminals — and “gold” — bribery — in schemes used to foster local factions to further consolidate the central dominance of state since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) first arrived in Taiwan. Both major political parties, the KMT and the DPP, have said that their election nomination regulations are already stricter than the law. However, civil groups have said that, among the 1,677 county and city councilor candidates in last month’s local elections, 195 had been convicted of crimes, including 66 nominated by the KMT and 36 by the DPP. Many of these candidates were elected with a large number of votes in their favor, mostly from local political factions.
Political parties often sacrifice ethics on the altar of political gain. In 2007, the KMT revised its primary regulations overnight, lifting a ban on anyone who had been prosecuted from standing in an election so that then-Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who had been indicted on charges of embezzling his mayoral allowance fund, could run for the 2008 presidential election.
In the local council speaker and deputy speaker elections, several candidates supported by political parties or alliances have been accused of being in gangs. While criticizing its opponents for plagiarizing their theses, the KMT chose candidates who had had their degree withdrawn due to plagiarism or were listed as gangsters to run for city council speaker.
Legislation alone cannot prevent politicians from using camouflage or sophistry, neither can it guarantee that elections are clean and ethical. It is the responsibility of voters to choose officials who are wise and capable. Otherwise, a black cloud will continue to loom over democracy and Taiwan’s elections.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS