After the plagiarism scandals and allegations in the run-up to last month’s local elections, the hot topic ahead of a by-election in Taipei’s third electoral district is the issue of “black gold,” that is, bribery and affiliation with criminals. The Cabinet and the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have proposed draft amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法) to bar those with criminal records for certain crimes from running for office. The public, tired of inter-party mudslinging, would surely welcome a “clean election.”
According to Article 26 of the act, people who have committed and been sentenced for the crimes of insurrection, foreign aggression, corruption or interfering with others’ voting rights through threats of violence or other illegal means are barred from standing in elections, but those convicted of other crimes are allowed to run for office, after serving their prison term.
The Cabinet and the DPP have drafted amendments to ban people convicted of offenses related to organized crime, money laundering, firearms, drugs or vote-buying from running in national and local elections. Those convicted of national security breaches, including contravening the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) or the National Security Act (國家安全法), and felonies with sentences of more than 10 years in prison would also be barred.
It is hoped that the amendment will take effect before the 2024 legislative and presidential elections.
People convicted of certain crimes are already prohibited from being candidates in legislation specific to those crimes, for example the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法) and the Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例). The proposed amendments would set higher ethical standards for all potential national and local public officials.
Eligibility to run in an election is protected by the Constitution, and convicts deserve a chance to reintegrate into society after serving their sentence. So expanding election regulations should be a rigorous process and more consensus should be sought from the public. Besides, commitment to holding a “clean election” by political parties would be a more crucial factor or, more precisely perhaps, a challenge.
Local elections have been influenced by “black” — gangsters and organized criminals — and “gold” — bribery — in schemes used to foster local factions to further consolidate the central dominance of state since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) first arrived in Taiwan. Both major political parties, the KMT and the DPP, have said that their election nomination regulations are already stricter than the law. However, civil groups have said that, among the 1,677 county and city councilor candidates in last month’s local elections, 195 had been convicted of crimes, including 66 nominated by the KMT and 36 by the DPP. Many of these candidates were elected with a large number of votes in their favor, mostly from local political factions.
Political parties often sacrifice ethics on the altar of political gain. In 2007, the KMT revised its primary regulations overnight, lifting a ban on anyone who had been prosecuted from standing in an election so that then-Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who had been indicted on charges of embezzling his mayoral allowance fund, could run for the 2008 presidential election.
In the local council speaker and deputy speaker elections, several candidates supported by political parties or alliances have been accused of being in gangs. While criticizing its opponents for plagiarizing their theses, the KMT chose candidates who had had their degree withdrawn due to plagiarism or were listed as gangsters to run for city council speaker.
Legislation alone cannot prevent politicians from using camouflage or sophistry, neither can it guarantee that elections are clean and ethical. It is the responsibility of voters to choose officials who are wise and capable. Otherwise, a black cloud will continue to loom over democracy and Taiwan’s elections.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under