After the plagiarism scandals and allegations in the run-up to last month’s local elections, the hot topic ahead of a by-election in Taipei’s third electoral district is the issue of “black gold,” that is, bribery and affiliation with criminals. The Cabinet and the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have proposed draft amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法) to bar those with criminal records for certain crimes from running for office. The public, tired of inter-party mudslinging, would surely welcome a “clean election.”
According to Article 26 of the act, people who have committed and been sentenced for the crimes of insurrection, foreign aggression, corruption or interfering with others’ voting rights through threats of violence or other illegal means are barred from standing in elections, but those convicted of other crimes are allowed to run for office, after serving their prison term.
The Cabinet and the DPP have drafted amendments to ban people convicted of offenses related to organized crime, money laundering, firearms, drugs or vote-buying from running in national and local elections. Those convicted of national security breaches, including contravening the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) or the National Security Act (國家安全法), and felonies with sentences of more than 10 years in prison would also be barred.
It is hoped that the amendment will take effect before the 2024 legislative and presidential elections.
People convicted of certain crimes are already prohibited from being candidates in legislation specific to those crimes, for example the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法) and the Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例). The proposed amendments would set higher ethical standards for all potential national and local public officials.
Eligibility to run in an election is protected by the Constitution, and convicts deserve a chance to reintegrate into society after serving their sentence. So expanding election regulations should be a rigorous process and more consensus should be sought from the public. Besides, commitment to holding a “clean election” by political parties would be a more crucial factor or, more precisely perhaps, a challenge.
Local elections have been influenced by “black” — gangsters and organized criminals — and “gold” — bribery — in schemes used to foster local factions to further consolidate the central dominance of state since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) first arrived in Taiwan. Both major political parties, the KMT and the DPP, have said that their election nomination regulations are already stricter than the law. However, civil groups have said that, among the 1,677 county and city councilor candidates in last month’s local elections, 195 had been convicted of crimes, including 66 nominated by the KMT and 36 by the DPP. Many of these candidates were elected with a large number of votes in their favor, mostly from local political factions.
Political parties often sacrifice ethics on the altar of political gain. In 2007, the KMT revised its primary regulations overnight, lifting a ban on anyone who had been prosecuted from standing in an election so that then-Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who had been indicted on charges of embezzling his mayoral allowance fund, could run for the 2008 presidential election.
In the local council speaker and deputy speaker elections, several candidates supported by political parties or alliances have been accused of being in gangs. While criticizing its opponents for plagiarizing their theses, the KMT chose candidates who had had their degree withdrawn due to plagiarism or were listed as gangsters to run for city council speaker.
Legislation alone cannot prevent politicians from using camouflage or sophistry, neither can it guarantee that elections are clean and ethical. It is the responsibility of voters to choose officials who are wise and capable. Otherwise, a black cloud will continue to loom over democracy and Taiwan’s elections.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS