In China, the “Blank Paper Movement” or the “A4 Revolution” is opposing the Chinese government’s COVID-19 policies, including endless testing for the virus and lockdowns.
Some participants have called for Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) resignation, and because of this, some people have predicted that a situation similar to the Tiananmen Square Massacre might happen.
Others even suggested that Xi might attack Taiwan to divert attention if the movement keeps growing. These scenarios are imaginative, but mostly improbable.
Compared with Hong Kong’s 2019 anti-extradition protests, which drew 2 million participants, the unorganized “Blank Paper Movement” still has a long way to go. That it is happening in mainland China — rather than in a quasi-foreign territory like Hong Kong — allows the Chinese government to suppress it with ease.
Taiwanese must understand that if Taiwan were to be ruled by China, any opposition would be crushed. Taiwanese have to defend the nation’s safety, freedom of speech and democracy. This is a mission that they must undertake. They have to take the responsibility for the next generations.
The US Department of Defense has released its Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2022 report, which addresses a hypothetical Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
The report said that China lacks the capacity to carry out “an amphibious invasion of Taiwan,” but it would be capable of taking over Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島) and the islands of Kinmen and Lienchiang counties.
Reports from the US Department of Defense have made the same points over the past 15 years.
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait have maintained a military balance for years. Many Taiwanese are fearful of provoking China when reports say an invasion might occur soon.
Taiwanese should resist China and defend Taiwan, but some “local collaborators” have criticized such a stance, calling it as idiotic as the Boxer Rebellion.
Such tactics “might” provoke China and lead to war, they have said.
I wonder what they are thinking.
China is not capable of conducting an amphibious invasion — it would be suicidal for Beijing to wage war in the Taiwan Strait.
A failed operation would force Xi to step down, the Chinese Communist Party would die a horrible death and China could break apart.
Xi is not such an idiot that he would take that risk.
Chen Kuo-hsiung is a director of the Taiwan National Security Institute.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS