In China, the “Blank Paper Movement” or the “A4 Revolution” is opposing the Chinese government’s COVID-19 policies, including endless testing for the virus and lockdowns.
Some participants have called for Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) resignation, and because of this, some people have predicted that a situation similar to the Tiananmen Square Massacre might happen.
Others even suggested that Xi might attack Taiwan to divert attention if the movement keeps growing. These scenarios are imaginative, but mostly improbable.
Compared with Hong Kong’s 2019 anti-extradition protests, which drew 2 million participants, the unorganized “Blank Paper Movement” still has a long way to go. That it is happening in mainland China — rather than in a quasi-foreign territory like Hong Kong — allows the Chinese government to suppress it with ease.
Taiwanese must understand that if Taiwan were to be ruled by China, any opposition would be crushed. Taiwanese have to defend the nation’s safety, freedom of speech and democracy. This is a mission that they must undertake. They have to take the responsibility for the next generations.
The US Department of Defense has released its Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2022 report, which addresses a hypothetical Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
The report said that China lacks the capacity to carry out “an amphibious invasion of Taiwan,” but it would be capable of taking over Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島) and the islands of Kinmen and Lienchiang counties.
Reports from the US Department of Defense have made the same points over the past 15 years.
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait have maintained a military balance for years. Many Taiwanese are fearful of provoking China when reports say an invasion might occur soon.
Taiwanese should resist China and defend Taiwan, but some “local collaborators” have criticized such a stance, calling it as idiotic as the Boxer Rebellion.
Such tactics “might” provoke China and lead to war, they have said.
I wonder what they are thinking.
China is not capable of conducting an amphibious invasion — it would be suicidal for Beijing to wage war in the Taiwan Strait.
A failed operation would force Xi to step down, the Chinese Communist Party would die a horrible death and China could break apart.
Xi is not such an idiot that he would take that risk.
Chen Kuo-hsiung is a director of the Taiwan National Security Institute.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS