A referendum held in conjunction with local government elections on Saturday proposed lowering the voting age from 20 to 18. However, Central Election Commission (CEC) data showed that votes fell short of the threshold — almost 9.62 million “yes” votes needed to pass — as only 5.65 million voters backed the proposed constitutional amendment, while 5.02 million voters opposed it.
Prior to the results, the Taiwan Alliance for Advancement of Youth Rights and Welfare, the Taiwan Youth Association for Democracy and other civil groups had argued that if people face obligations such as paying taxes and compulsory military service at 18 years old, they should also be given the right to vote.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) found the referendum result regrettable. The DPP said its candidates had seized every opportunity to urge supporters to back the proposed amendment in public events over the past few months, while the KMT said it respects the decision of voters and that its support for lowering the voting age remains unchanged.
There are several reasons for the referendum’s failure. The first is the relatively low voter turnout and the high threshold for the proposal’s passage. The average voter turnout rate across cities has been about 66 percent, yet it fell to a new low of 61.22 percent this year. Reaching the threshold of 9.62 million votes is incredibly ambitious. In Taiwan, presidential elections tend to have the highest turnout rate. Even President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who won a landslide victory with a record-breaking 8.17 million votes in 2018, would have fallen short of the goal by 1.49 million votes. This showcases the challenge of amending the Constitution.
Second, political parties did not exert enough effort in promoting the referendum. As the Executive Yuan and the CEC announced the referendum in September, political parties across the spectrum were not given much time to talk to the public about it. In contrast with their efforts to promote last year’s four referendum questions, there was no comprehensive approach to introduce the issue this year. With the parties concentrating on the mayoral campaigns, addressing scandals and even mudslinging, the referendum was marginalized. The straightforward nature of the question also failed to generate debate in society, which led to public indifference.
Third, ideology influenced the outcome. The result shows that Taiwan is essentially a conservative society. Having not yet broken free of the shackles of the former KMT government’s autocratic rule, the obsolete ideas of deference and obedience to authority still loom in some people’s minds. With one side believing that 18-year-olds are still too young to vote, not to mention run for office, and the other side having faith in the judgement of young people, there was a clash of ideology. Furthermore, as some voters believe that young people tend to favor the DPP, their disapproval of the ruling party might have made them cast “no” votes.
Taiwan is one of the very few democratic countries to have maintained a voting age of 20, while neighboring countries, such as South Korea and Japan, have in recent years lowered the voting age to 18. Taiwan must jump on the bandwagon. It needs to let go of its “age bias” and invite young people to engage in politics. Young people’s voices are fundamental to the development and consolidation of Taiwan’s democracy.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS