The trial of Jimmy Lai (黎智英), the Hong Kong pro-democracy campaigner and media tycoon, which is to start today, marks another low point in China’s relentless assault on individual and civil rights in Britain’s former colony — whose traditional freedoms Beijing is legally bound to uphold.
Lai, a British citizen who founded the popular Apple Daily newspaper, faces charges of conspiracy to publish seditious material and collusion with foreign powers under Beijing’s draconian 2020 National Security Law. The accusations are offensive and ridiculous. In effect, the Chinese Communist Party is mounting a show trial.
Like hundreds of others being held without bail, Lai, if found guilty by a handpicked, three-judge panel acting without a jury, faces a life sentence. He is already in solitary confinement after an earlier conviction for unlawful assembly and fraud. Lai denies the charges. This political persecution must cease.
Hong Kong’s huge pro-democracy protests in 2019-2020, which led to more than 10,000 arrests, were sparked by China’s introduction of an illiberal extradition bill. The foolishly violent response of the security forces transformed the demonstrations into a student-led mass movement challenging Beijing’s right to rule.
For an authoritarian, one-party system, any such display of defiance, whether in Xinjiang, Tibet or in lockdown-stressed Shanghai, is unforgivable. For the insecure Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), spreading dissent is more dangerous than spreading COVID-19. His Hong Kong policy now resembles a vendetta.
Last week’s conviction of Hong Kong’s respected Catholic leader, Cardinal Joseph Zen (陳日君), and five other activists showed again how little respect Xi’s China has for personal liberties and legal obligations under the 1984 Sino-British joint declaration. Zen was fined for failing to register a support fund for detained protesters.
China’s arrogant and threatening behavior on multiple fronts requires a robust response from Britain. Whether the issue is the violent antics of Chinese diplomats in Manchester, England, or insidious threats to UK academic freedom, government dithering, indecision and pusillanimity cannot continue.
In 2020, the US imposed sanctions on officials involved in repression in Hong Kong. Britain has still to take any equivalent steps. Last week, Liberal Democrat lawmaker Alistair Carmichael, who cochairs the all-party parliamentary group on Hong Kong, demanded swift action.
“It is vital that the government implements sanctions on individuals who have been identified as directly involved in the systemic violations of human rights... Legitimate targets for sanctions include former chief executive, Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥), and former deputy police commissioner, Chris Tang (鄧炳強),” Carmichael wrote.
It is vital that Britain takes a stand when anti-democratic governments such as China tear up treaties, resort to threats and ignore international law. This is the case with China’s armed intimidation of Taiwan, its South China Sea bullying, and industrial and political espionage targeting the West.
China’s reported creation of “police stations” in European and US cities to monitor and pressurize overseas dissidents is another chilling example of unacceptable activity. The British government was right to offer visas to thousands of Hong Kongers. It was also right last week to block the takeover on security grounds of the UK’s largest producer of semiconductors by a China-owned business.
However, its overall approach to relations with Beijing requires urgent clarification. What is British policy? No one really knows.
Speaking in Bali, Indonesia, where a long-scheduled meeting with Xi was abruptly canceled, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak appeared confused over whether China was a “threat” or a “systemic challenge.” He called it both. Some Conservatives call it an enemy.
Sunak must sort out his ideas. China is on the march — and Xi takes no prisoners.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
Chinese intimidation of Taiwan has entered a chilling new phase: bolder, more multifaceted and unconstrained by diplomatic norms. For years, Taiwan has weathered economic coercion, military threats, diplomatic isolation, political interference, espionage and disinformation, but the direct targeting of elected leaders abroad signals an alarming escalation in Beijing’s campaign of hostility. Czech military intelligence recently uncovered a plot that reads like fiction, but is all too real. Chinese diplomats and civil secret service in Prague had planned to ram the motorcade of then-vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and physically assault her during her visit to the Czech Republic in March last
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
RSS