The Criminal Investigation Bureau recently released data showing that from July 27 to Nov. 16, it probed 35 cases of employment abductions, home invasions and human trafficking in cities and counties across Taiwan, with 150 victims rescued.
The local elections took the spotlight away from these cases and robbed them of the attention they deserved. Undoubtedly, this is a blow to the government and its international image.
The criminals involved in employment scams and international organ harvesting are despicable, but it is possible that some of the victims might have intended to gain from the fraudsters — without expecting that they would become prey.
It seems necessary to amend the law to prevent get-rich-quick schemes, and generally prevent deeper abuses.
The Legislative Yuan amended the Criminal Code in 2014 by adding Article 339-4 to increase penalties for fraud, which were previously governed by Article 5 of the code, covering crimes committed outside the country.
In 2017, the Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例) was extensively amended to redefine a criminal organization as “a structured, permanent or profit-seeking organization” involved in certain offenses.
At that time, apart from penalties, offenders had to perform “compulsory labor” for three years prior to sentencing.
Statistics show that the amendments effectively lowered such crimes.
To protect human rights, the then-Council of Grand Justices in 2019 issued Constitutional Interpretation No. 775 to declare that Article 47 of the Criminal Code was unconstitutional for stating “the principal punishment for a recidivist shall be increased up to one half.”
In several landmark rulings, the Supreme Court has said that the definition of “recidivist” does not conform with progress made in modern criminal law reform and should be abolished.
Moreover, the Constitutional Court on Dec. 10 issued Constitutional Interpretation No. 812, declaring that the compulsory labor penalties in the Criminal Code and various “special criminal laws” are unconstitutional, and have lost efficacy since the date of the interpretation.
It remains to be seen whether the interpretations might increase fraudulent behavior, and whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship.
Taiwan’s Criminal Code over time has been adopting the characteristics of Japanese and German criminal laws. Although Japan’s code does not include compulsory labor, the punishment for a recidivist can be increased by twice the maximum term of imprisonment for the crime, which is heavier than the punishment for a recidivist in Taiwan.
The German Criminal Code abolished recidivist punishment in 1986, although Section 66 of the code states: “The court orders preventive detention in addition to a sentence of imprisonment where ... the offender has twice been sentenced to imprisonment for a term of at least one year in each case.”
This allows the court to remove dangerous repeat offenders from society — organized crime members and sex offenders, for instance — while correcting them simultaneously through “preventive detention” to maintain social order. There is no time limit for such detention.
With recidivist punishment and preventive detention, Japan and Germany have effectively curbed fraudulent activity.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s Criminal Code is stuck between the Japanese and German models.
Chao Hsuey-wen is a university assistant professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
RSS