Although the share price of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has fallen significantly amid concerns over worldwide inflation, US billionaire investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway spent a massive US$4.1 billion on the chipmaker’s American depositary receipts.
Reporting on Buffett’s investment in TSMC, some Chinese-language media outlets have said that it would give the Taiwanese economy a shot in the arm.
Although TSMC has planted its flag in various countries around the world, Taiwan is still its most important base. The US invited TSMC to set up a plant in Arizona, because it was worried that its source of cutting-edge chips would dry up if China attacks Taiwan and TSMC’s domestic facilities are destroyed.
The US outshines Taiwan in terms of key equipment and materials for silicon wafer production, but even when TSMC’s US plants start mass production, they would still not be able to replace production in Taiwan.
TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) has said that Taiwan is the only place where TSMC can make such high-end chips.
There are many reasons for this, including Taiwan’s outstanding talent, technology and corporate culture. Moreover, a highly integrated supply chain formed by industrial clusters surrounding TSMC cannot be easily enticed to move away from Taiwan.
Another aspect that receives less attention is Taiwan’s circular economy. The semiconductor industry uses many chemicals, and because of the precision chipmaking requires, most of them, such as photoresists, etchants, phosphoric acid and hydrofluoric acid, cannot be reused. In contrast to the metal-processing industry, chipmakers can only use these chemicals for one round of processing.
There are many highly specialized businesses in Taiwan that process chipmakers’ waste chemicals and, after separation and purification, supply them for use in downstream industries.
Take the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區) as an example: There are recycling plants that serve its chip plants in Hsinchu County’s Hukou Townshhip (湖口) and Taoyuan’s Dayuan (大園) and Guanyin (觀音) districts, all within a radius of 100km of the park. Although these companies use conventional chemical industrial processes, the specific nature of their business and their deep familiarity with chipmaking waste materials make them an indispensable “venous industry” for the sustainable development of the semiconductor industry.
The Industrial Development Bureau certifies recycled chemicals’ environmental friendliness.
Taiwan’s resource-recycling industries enable its chipmakers to fully comply with the UN’s sustainable development goals. The nation has established a comprehensive audit and management system for the recovery and reuse of chemicals in the semiconductor industry. In terms of a circular economy manufacturing system, these advantages would be hard for any company to re-establish in another country after leaving Taiwan.
Taiwan’s success in this respect is something that could be worth sharing with other countries.
Chen Wen-ching is executive director of the Formosa Association of Resource Recycling.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
RSS