With only three days remaining before Saturday’s nine-in-one elections, campaigns are turning white-hot. Voters are on the same day being asked to decide on a referendum to amend the Constitution to lower the voting age and eligibility for standing in elections to 18. However, many voters appear to be apathetic to the proposal, which could significantly affect Taiwan’s development as a democracy.
The referendum is unlikely to pass due to the considerable voter threshold required. The Central Election Commission has said that more than 9.65 million voters need to vote “yes” for the proposal to pass, based upon the Additional Articles of the Constitution (憲法增修條文) requirement that more than 50 percent of the 19.3 million eligible voters nationwide approve the referendum.
The previous four referendums had much lower thresholds, requiring one-quarter of eligible voters to vote in favor and that the “yes” votes surpass the “no” votes. Voter turnout in 2004, 2008 and last year all failed to reach 50 percent, and needless to say, the votes in favor were far below the threshold for a constitutional amendment to pass. Based on the results of the 2018 local elections, with a turnout of 65 percent, the referendum would need votes from at least 77 percent of that turnout.
Another challenge is that, although the amendment had been approved by legislators across party lines, a media survey at the end of last month showed that only about 43 percent of eligible voters expressed a willingness to vote “yes” in the referendum. Another survey found that more than 50 percent of voters have doubts about whether teens are ready to stand for election.
Some say that people under 20 are too young to make political decisions. This is despite 18-year-olds being defined as adults in the Civil Code and the Criminal Code, obliged to complete military service and pay taxes, eligible to work in public office and expected to take full criminal responsibility in legal matters. The Referendum Act (公民投票法) also states that any person who is 18 and not under guardianship has “the right of referendum unless otherwise provided by the Constitution.”
Most candidates running for office are older than 50, and the average age for elected village heads is about 58. Given Taiwan’s aging population, it is only right to allow younger people more participation in politics. In an era of advanced information technology and civic education, young people’s civic literacy is higher than ever. Teenagers are more concerned about public issues such as environmental protection, gender equality and human rights, and are more mature in scrutinizing and making judgements about civic issues.
The CIA’s World Factbook shows that most countries have a voting age of 18 or younger. The New Zealand government this week announced plans to draft legislation to lower the voting age to 16, after the Supreme Court ruled that not allowing people aged 16 or 17 to vote was discriminatory. Fewer than 5 percent of countries still have a voting age of older than 20. Taiwan is the only Asian democracy in which 18-year-olds cannot vote.
Taiwan needs to provide young people with the right to participate in policymaking to ensure generational equality, granting them full civic rights to decide their future and bring the nation in line with international trends. This Saturday should be an opportunity for Taiwan, a country committed to and widely recognized as a model of democracy, to achieve another landmark on its democratic journey.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS