As campaigning gathered pace in the final days before Malaysia’s general election, the destruction caused by a wave of flash flooding around the country also came to a head, forcing thousands of people to flee their homes.
However, despite some campaigners suspending events with voters due to rising floodwaters ahead of today’s election, being held during monsoon season, the issues of climate change and the environment have been largely absent in the campaigns and speeches of leading candidates.
“Given the impacts of COVID-19 and how small [businesses] were quite badly affected in the past couple of years, people are looking at better social welfare protection systems as a key issue,” said Renard Siew, a climate change adviser at the Kuala Lumpur-based think-tank Centre for Governance and Political Studies.
Environmental concerns “will sit at the bottom of the list” of voters’ priorities, he said.
Like many Southeast Asian nations, Malaysia already suffers regularly from the impacts of extreme weather and rising temperatures — be it air pollution caused by annual forest fires, water shortages, droughts or severe floods.
Last year, flooding in the country that started in mid-December caused nearly US$1.5 billion in losses and displaced more than 120,000 people.
This month, the states of Penang, Perak, Selangor, Melaka, Johor and Kelantan have been hit by flash floods, forcing thousands of people to seek refuge in evacuation centers.
Although faced with increasingly frequent flooding and more extreme weather, the top issues for Malaysian voters are mainly the economy, health and social care, political stability, corruption and the cost of living, environmentalists said.
For Calvin Chan, 26, a resident of Penang island, on the country’s northwest coast, today’s election would be the first time he could vote in a general election — with economic stability and the rising cost of living the big issues for him.
The price of his favorite meal — chicken rice and watermelon juice — is now about 30 percent more than a year ago, he said.
However, Chan knows the damage flooding can cause. During the monsoon season his street usually floods, making it difficult to leave his home, so he wants politicians to address the problem of climate change.
“They talk about floods, but have no solutions,” Chan said. “Green-minded people are considered a minority, but [candidates] should speak about minority topics to capture more votes.”
General elections held during Malaysia’s monsoon season are rare and usually avoided as emergency services are often stretched when handling flood relief efforts.
Flooding could prevent constituents from getting to the polls, as roads become impassable and vehicles or property can be damaged, or if documents required to vote are lost when homes are inundated, Greenpeace Malaysia campaigner Nur Sakeenah Omar said.
Flood victims dealing with property damage or struggling to access food and clean water would be facing more pressing issues than voting, she said.
Before the election, Greenpeace Malaysia conducted a study of members of parliament to learn what they had said in public about climate change and the environment in recent years.
It found that only 8.4 percent of all questions raised in parliament since 2018 contained at least one environment-related keyword.
The term “climate change” — perubahan iklim in Malay — came up in only 55 questions out of 19,401 in parliament during that time, the study found.
When floods were discussed, most Malaysian politicians blamed the problem on rivers and poorly designed or clogged drainage systems coupled with “unexpected heavy rainfall,” without making the link between the intensity of the rains and global warming, Omar said.
“Every sector of the government — including every ministry and every candidate — should be talking about climate change,” she said.
The three major coalitions looking to lead the next government — Barisan Nasional, Pakatan Harapan and Perikatan Nasional — did not respond to requests for comment.
Analysts have said forest loss could be contributing to the worsening floods in Malaysia, where a main driver of deforestation is the clearing of land to grow palm oil.
Data from monitoring service Global Forest Watch shows the country has lost almost a fifth of its primary forest since 2002, although deforestation rates have fallen in recent years as businesses and governments improved their conservation efforts.
Cutting down forests kills trees crucial for absorbing planet-warming carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and also reduces the ability of land to absorb floodwater.
Public knowledge of green issues such as the importance of forests and renewable energy is growing but would not “make a big dent” on voting patterns, said Damien Thanam, president of the non-governmental organization PEKA Malaysia.
While election candidates have not focused heavily on climate change, many of them have made pledges on forest protection and restoration, anti-air pollution and climate change laws, and easing taxes on electric vehicles.
However, with Malaysia among more than 140 nations that agreed to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030 at last year’s COP26 climate summit, firmer action would be needed from the next government, conservationists said.
“Politicians must all act now. There is no time left to waste,” WWF Malaysia conservation director Henry Chan said.
Some climate experts see promise in Malaysia’s young adults, many of whom would be voting for the first time after the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18.
An April survey by youth voting campaign group Undi18 showed that three-quarters of young Malaysians expressed concern about climate change.
“It’s the youths who are organizing climate rallies, demanding world leaders do more to address issues relating to climate change,” Siew said.
The country’s young people should use their vote to safeguard their future from the impacts of rising temperatures and environmental crises, Chan said.
“Speak up,” he said. “Ask candidates what disasters might be brought on by climate change in your constituency in the next 20 to 30 years, and how they will be fixed.”
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
RSS