As campaigning gathered pace in the final days before Malaysia’s general election, the destruction caused by a wave of flash flooding around the country also came to a head, forcing thousands of people to flee their homes.
However, despite some campaigners suspending events with voters due to rising floodwaters ahead of today’s election, being held during monsoon season, the issues of climate change and the environment have been largely absent in the campaigns and speeches of leading candidates.
“Given the impacts of COVID-19 and how small [businesses] were quite badly affected in the past couple of years, people are looking at better social welfare protection systems as a key issue,” said Renard Siew, a climate change adviser at the Kuala Lumpur-based think-tank Centre for Governance and Political Studies.
Environmental concerns “will sit at the bottom of the list” of voters’ priorities, he said.
Like many Southeast Asian nations, Malaysia already suffers regularly from the impacts of extreme weather and rising temperatures — be it air pollution caused by annual forest fires, water shortages, droughts or severe floods.
Last year, flooding in the country that started in mid-December caused nearly US$1.5 billion in losses and displaced more than 120,000 people.
This month, the states of Penang, Perak, Selangor, Melaka, Johor and Kelantan have been hit by flash floods, forcing thousands of people to seek refuge in evacuation centers.
Although faced with increasingly frequent flooding and more extreme weather, the top issues for Malaysian voters are mainly the economy, health and social care, political stability, corruption and the cost of living, environmentalists said.
For Calvin Chan, 26, a resident of Penang island, on the country’s northwest coast, today’s election would be the first time he could vote in a general election — with economic stability and the rising cost of living the big issues for him.
The price of his favorite meal — chicken rice and watermelon juice — is now about 30 percent more than a year ago, he said.
However, Chan knows the damage flooding can cause. During the monsoon season his street usually floods, making it difficult to leave his home, so he wants politicians to address the problem of climate change.
“They talk about floods, but have no solutions,” Chan said. “Green-minded people are considered a minority, but [candidates] should speak about minority topics to capture more votes.”
General elections held during Malaysia’s monsoon season are rare and usually avoided as emergency services are often stretched when handling flood relief efforts.
Flooding could prevent constituents from getting to the polls, as roads become impassable and vehicles or property can be damaged, or if documents required to vote are lost when homes are inundated, Greenpeace Malaysia campaigner Nur Sakeenah Omar said.
Flood victims dealing with property damage or struggling to access food and clean water would be facing more pressing issues than voting, she said.
Before the election, Greenpeace Malaysia conducted a study of members of parliament to learn what they had said in public about climate change and the environment in recent years.
It found that only 8.4 percent of all questions raised in parliament since 2018 contained at least one environment-related keyword.
The term “climate change” — perubahan iklim in Malay — came up in only 55 questions out of 19,401 in parliament during that time, the study found.
When floods were discussed, most Malaysian politicians blamed the problem on rivers and poorly designed or clogged drainage systems coupled with “unexpected heavy rainfall,” without making the link between the intensity of the rains and global warming, Omar said.
“Every sector of the government — including every ministry and every candidate — should be talking about climate change,” she said.
The three major coalitions looking to lead the next government — Barisan Nasional, Pakatan Harapan and Perikatan Nasional — did not respond to requests for comment.
Analysts have said forest loss could be contributing to the worsening floods in Malaysia, where a main driver of deforestation is the clearing of land to grow palm oil.
Data from monitoring service Global Forest Watch shows the country has lost almost a fifth of its primary forest since 2002, although deforestation rates have fallen in recent years as businesses and governments improved their conservation efforts.
Cutting down forests kills trees crucial for absorbing planet-warming carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and also reduces the ability of land to absorb floodwater.
Public knowledge of green issues such as the importance of forests and renewable energy is growing but would not “make a big dent” on voting patterns, said Damien Thanam, president of the non-governmental organization PEKA Malaysia.
While election candidates have not focused heavily on climate change, many of them have made pledges on forest protection and restoration, anti-air pollution and climate change laws, and easing taxes on electric vehicles.
However, with Malaysia among more than 140 nations that agreed to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030 at last year’s COP26 climate summit, firmer action would be needed from the next government, conservationists said.
“Politicians must all act now. There is no time left to waste,” WWF Malaysia conservation director Henry Chan said.
Some climate experts see promise in Malaysia’s young adults, many of whom would be voting for the first time after the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18.
An April survey by youth voting campaign group Undi18 showed that three-quarters of young Malaysians expressed concern about climate change.
“It’s the youths who are organizing climate rallies, demanding world leaders do more to address issues relating to climate change,” Siew said.
The country’s young people should use their vote to safeguard their future from the impacts of rising temperatures and environmental crises, Chan said.
“Speak up,” he said. “Ask candidates what disasters might be brought on by climate change in your constituency in the next 20 to 30 years, and how they will be fixed.”
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS