Donations and popularity
Former minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), the Democratic Progressive Party candidate for Taipei mayor, has raised more than NT$98.7 million (US$3.1 million) in political donations, twice that of the campaign war chest raised by independent Taipei mayoral candidate Vivian Huang (黃珊珊), a former Taipei deputy mayor.
The amount of contributions, according to some academics, reflects a candidate’s appeal.
Huang said the amount of political donations a candidate attracts is unimportant, and that as an independent candidate without the backing of a political party, it was only natural that she would be at a disadvantage.
She said that she had received many smaller donations, and her campaign merchandise was selling well — and that these represent votes in the bank.
She also raised questions about those who spend big on their campaigns, saying they would owe favors should they get elected. Following this logic, Huang might want to reflect on how her comments affect her former boss, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
A Control Yuan report on political contributions during the 2014 Taipei mayoral race showed that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) received more than NT$110 million in donations, compared with Ko’s more than NT$139.82 million, including NT$115 million from individuals, the rest being from anonymous sources and for-profit organizations.
Ko spent NT$142.36 million, overshooting his war chest by more than NT$2.5 million. In all, Ko received far more than Chen has this time around.
Political contributions are a measure of a candidate’s appeal, and Ko at the time was clearly very appealing.
How many favors did he have to repay? I guess we will never know.
Chang Hui-ho
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS