Donations and popularity
Former minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), the Democratic Progressive Party candidate for Taipei mayor, has raised more than NT$98.7 million (US$3.1 million) in political donations, twice that of the campaign war chest raised by independent Taipei mayoral candidate Vivian Huang (黃珊珊), a former Taipei deputy mayor.
The amount of contributions, according to some academics, reflects a candidate’s appeal.
Huang said the amount of political donations a candidate attracts is unimportant, and that as an independent candidate without the backing of a political party, it was only natural that she would be at a disadvantage.
She said that she had received many smaller donations, and her campaign merchandise was selling well — and that these represent votes in the bank.
She also raised questions about those who spend big on their campaigns, saying they would owe favors should they get elected. Following this logic, Huang might want to reflect on how her comments affect her former boss, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
A Control Yuan report on political contributions during the 2014 Taipei mayoral race showed that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) received more than NT$110 million in donations, compared with Ko’s more than NT$139.82 million, including NT$115 million from individuals, the rest being from anonymous sources and for-profit organizations.
Ko spent NT$142.36 million, overshooting his war chest by more than NT$2.5 million. In all, Ko received far more than Chen has this time around.
Political contributions are a measure of a candidate’s appeal, and Ko at the time was clearly very appealing.
How many favors did he have to repay? I guess we will never know.
Chang Hui-ho
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS